Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point Article 120 Sexual Assault Court-Martial Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice governs offenses involving sexual misconduct, distinguishing between sexual assault—acts involving penetration without consent—and abusive sexual contact, which covers unwanted sexual touching that does not rise to the level of penetration. This framework applies fully to service members stationed at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point.
Both sexual assault and abusive sexual contact under Article 120 are treated as felony-level offenses within the military justice system, meaning an accused Marine or sailor can face a general court-martial with significant punitive exposure. The classification reflects the seriousness with which the military views these allegations.
Prosecution of Article 120 offenses at Cherry Point is controlled within the command structure, with commanders initiating actions, directing investigations, and deciding whether charges proceed to court-martial. This command-driven system shapes the pace, scope, and handling of each case from the outset.
Unlike civilian jurisdictions where independent prosecutors make charging decisions, the military system places authority in the chain of command and follows the procedures set by the UCMJ and the Manual for Courts-Martial, creating a distinct process for addressing Article 120 allegations on the installation.
Article 120 covers felony-level sexual assault offenses in the military, which can escalate quickly through investigations and charging decisions at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point. Cases often hinge on expert evidence, interviews, and potential administrative separation reviews. Gonzalez & Waddington provide defense guidance at 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point operates within a zero‑tolerance culture for misconduct, and leadership has strict reporting obligations when potential violations arise. These mandatory notifications move allegations rapidly through legal and command channels, creating immediate attention and formal review even at the earliest stages.
The installation’s command structure emphasizes risk management and visibility, meaning that any issue with potential impact on good order, discipline, or the welfare of Marines receives prompt oversight. This approach ensures that leaders at multiple levels are informed, which naturally accelerates the pace at which an allegation is evaluated.
In addition to the criminal investigative process, a service member can be simultaneously exposed to administrative procedures, including potential administrative separation. These parallel tracks can unfold quickly and independently, contributing to the perception of rapid escalation once an Article 120 allegation is reported.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Investigations frequently involve scenarios where alcohol consumption, off‑duty socializing, or mixed‑rank gatherings reportedly contribute to memory gaps or conflicting recollections. These circumstances often lead to uncertainty about events, prompting commands or NCIS to initiate inquiries even when involved parties raise questions about what they remember.
Digital interactions also appear often, with dating apps, text messages, and social media exchanges becoming central to how service members first connect. These communications can later be scrutinized for context, tone, or intent, with investigators reviewing message histories to understand how an encounter developed before any allegation was made.
Cases may arise from barracks environments or tight-knit unit settings where personal relationships overlap with professional duties. Disagreements between partners, breakups, or misunderstandings within peer groups can lead to third‑party reporting, sometimes by friends, supervisors, or command members who become aware of concerns and feel obligated to notify authorities.
Article 120 investigations at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point often involve coordinated efforts between military law enforcement agencies and command authorities to gather facts surrounding allegations. These inquiries focus on identifying the sources of evidence, documenting each step taken by investigators, and compiling materials that may later be reviewed by legal personnel.
The evidence collected during these investigations can come from multiple channels, ranging from physical and digital records to statements provided by individuals involved in or connected to the reported incident. Each component is examined to establish what occurred and to preserve materials relevant to the official process.
MRE 412 restricts the introduction of an alleged victim’s sexual behavior or predisposition, making it a core evidentiary barrier that shapes what information the factfinder may hear in Article 120 cases at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point.
MRE 413 and MRE 414, by contrast, allow the government to introduce evidence of an accused’s prior sexual offenses or child molestation offenses, creating an evidentiary pathway that can significantly expand the scope of information presented at trial.
Because these rules require detailed motions, hearings, and judicial determinations of admissibility, they structure much of the pretrial litigation and influence how both parties develop their examinations and overall case theories.
As a result, the court’s evidentiary rulings under MRE 412, 413, and 414 often define the contours of the trial itself, setting the limits on what the panel or judge may consider and framing the narrative that unfolds in the courtroom.
Article 120 cases at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point often hinge on the strength and interpretation of expert testimony. Because these cases frequently involve conflicting accounts and limited physical evidence, prosecutors and defense counsel rely heavily on specialized experts to explain complex issues such as trauma responses, digital evidence, and the effects of alcohol on memory. The credibility of these experts and the methods they use can significantly influence how factfinders interpret the events in question.
Defense teams commonly focus on challenging the reliability of government experts, pointing out methodological limitations, alternative explanations, and investigative shortcomings. Understanding how expert testimony can be misapplied or overstated is essential for evaluating the credibility of allegations and ensuring that the trier of fact receives accurate, balanced information about what the evidence truly shows.
Service members at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point can face administrative separation based solely on Article 120 allegations, even when no court‑martial conviction occurs. Commanders may initiate this process when they believe the alleged conduct undermines good order, discipline, or unit cohesion, making the administrative route an independent mechanism of accountability.
These cases often move into a Board of Inquiry, sometimes referred to as a show-cause board, where the service member must respond to the command’s basis for separation. The BOI evaluates whether the alleged misconduct occurred by a lower standard of proof than used in criminal proceedings, which can increase the risk of separation despite unresolved or unproven allegations.
If separation is recommended, the characterization of discharge—Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable—becomes a central issue. The characterization reflects the board’s assessment of the service member’s overall performance and the weight they assign to the allegations, and it can significantly affect post-service opportunities.
An adverse characterization or forced separation can impact eligibility for certain veterans’ benefits, limit future military career options, and disrupt retirement planning by preventing members from reaching key service milestones. These administrative consequences demonstrate how Article 120 allegations can alter long-term career and financial stability even in the absence of criminal findings.
Article 120 cases often unfold alongside broader sex crimes investigations, which can involve NCIS, command legal officers, and other investigative authorities at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point. These inquiries typically run parallel to the criminal process, gathering evidence and determining whether conduct violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Understanding this overlap helps service members anticipate how administrative and criminal tracks may progress at the same time.
In addition to the criminal investigation, commanders may initiate command-directed investigations to examine the surrounding circumstances, assess command climate issues, or evaluate whether additional misconduct occurred. These inquiries do not replace the Article 120 process but can influence command decisions regarding interim measures, duty status, and recommendations for administrative or disciplinary actions.
Depending on the findings from both the Article 120 case and related administrative inquiries, service members may also face administrative consequences such as Letters of Reprimand or even Boards of Inquiry. These actions can occur whether or not a case proceeds to court-martial, and they allow the command to address concerns related to fitness for service, professionalism, and compliance with Marine Corps standards.
With decades of military justice experience, the attorneys at Gonzalez & Waddington are frequently retained in Article 120 cases arising at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point because they understand how to build defense strategies that withstand intense scrutiny. Their approach emphasizes early trial planning, meticulous motions practice, and identifying constitutional, evidentiary, or procedural issues that can shape the trajectory of a case long before it reaches a panel.
The firm is known for rigorous cross‑examination that focuses on exposing inconsistencies, bias, and weaknesses in government evidence. When expert testimony is involved, they apply structured impeachment methods drawn from extensive courtroom experience to challenge the foundations, methodology, or assumptions underpinning forensic and psychological opinions.
Gonzalez & Waddington’s contributions to published works on trial advocacy have made them a resource for practitioners seeking advanced courtroom techniques. This scholarship, combined with years of handling complex courts‑martial across the armed forces, informs the strategic decisions they bring to Article 120 defense at MCAS Cherry Point.
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice outlines criminal offenses related to sexual assault and abusive sexual contact. It defines prohibited conduct, required mental states, and the elements prosecutors must prove. Service members at MCAS Cherry Point are subject to these standards during any investigation or proceedings.
Military law requires that consent be freely given and that both parties have the ability to understand and agree to the conduct. Investigators and legal officials examine words, actions, and surrounding circumstances to assess whether consent was present. Lack of resistance alone does not equal consent under Article 120.
Alcohol use can influence how investigators assess a service member’s ability to consent or understand events. Statements, witness accounts, and medical findings are often reviewed to determine the level of impairment involved. Both the reporting party’s and accused’s alcohol consumption may be documented during the investigative process.
Digital evidence such as messages, photos, and location data is often collected to help establish timelines and interactions. Investigators may review devices, social media accounts, and communication logs under authorized procedures. Such material can become part of the case record during military legal proceedings.
Expert testimony can help explain topics such as trauma responses, forensic evidence, or digital forensics. These experts may be consulted by investigators or appear during hearings and trials. Their role is to clarify technical matters that could influence how facts are understood by decision‑makers.
An Article 120 investigation may trigger separate administrative reviews within a Marine’s command. Command leadership can initiate administrative separation processes regardless of criminal case status. These actions follow distinct procedures governed by military regulations.
Investigations typically begin with reporting to military authorities and assignment of the case to law enforcement such as NCIS. Investigators gather statements, physical evidence, and digital materials to build a case file. Command officials and legal personnel review the findings as the case progresses.
Service members have the option to retain a civilian attorney in addition to any detailed military counsel. Civilian lawyers can interact with investigators or command channels within the bounds of military procedures. Their participation occurs alongside existing military legal processes at MCAS Cherry Point.
Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point is located in eastern North Carolina, near the coastal town of Havelock and within easy reach of the larger communities of New Bern and Morehead City. The installation sits within the state’s Tidewater region, an area defined by flat terrain, expansive wetlands, and proximity to the Atlantic coastline. This geography enables year-round aviation operations with minimal airspace congestion, making the base a strategic hub for Marine Corps aviation on the East Coast. Cherry Point is closely linked with the surrounding civilian communities, which provide essential housing, services, and employment opportunities, creating a strong military‑civil integration unique to this part of North Carolina.
The installation hosts Marine aviation forces and several tenant commands that support the broader mission of the II Marine Expeditionary Force. Cherry Point’s primary purpose is to provide a platform for aviation readiness, maintenance, and sustainment, with units focused on fixed‑wing operations, depot‑level aircraft repair, and expeditionary aviation logistics. The air station also serves as a launch point for rapid deployment to theaters across the globe, underscoring its role in strengthening the Marine Corps’ operational reach and responsiveness.
Cherry Point supports a substantial active duty population, including aviators, maintainers, logisticians, and personnel engaged in command-and-control and support functions. The tempo is driven by ongoing training flights, aircraft overhauls, and deployment cycles that link the installation to rotational forces abroad. While the base does not host entry-level trainees, it maintains a persistent flow of Marines and joint-service members moving through for operational support, specialized training, or pre-deployment preparation.
The demanding aviation and maintenance environment at Cherry Point often intersects with military justice matters. Service members assigned to or passing through the installation may face UCMJ actions, including commander-directed investigations, administrative separations, non‑judicial punishment, or courts-martial stemming from on-duty incidents, training requirements, or off-base conduct in nearby communities. Local command structures and the high‑tempo mission frequently shape how these cases are processed. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point.
Failure to interview key witnesses can significantly weaken the government’s case and create defense leverage.
An accuser can recant and the case may still proceed if the command believes other evidence supports the allegation.
Article 120 investigations often take months and sometimes over a year, depending on complexity and command priorities.
Yes, false or exaggerated allegations can still result in charges if commanders believe there is sufficient evidence.
Command influence can affect investigative scope, charging decisions, and how aggressively a case is pursued.
