Table Contents
Article 128b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice establishes criminal liability for domestic violence and abuse committed by a service member, addressing acts such as physical harm, attempted harm, or offensive contact directed at a spouse, intimate partner, or similarly situated individual. The provision also incorporates certain coercive or threatening behaviors when they occur within a domestic context, reflecting the military’s interest in addressing conduct that undermines personal safety and unit readiness.
The article applies specifically to relationship‑based allegations, requiring a qualifying domestic connection between the accused and the alleged victim. This includes current or former spouses, individuals with whom the accused has shared a child, and partners in intimate or similarly close relationships. The domestic relationship element distinguishes these offenses from general assault provisions and determines whether conduct falls within Article 128b or another UCMJ article.
Violations of Article 128b can expose a service member to felony‑level punishment under the UCMJ, including confinement and punitive discharge, and may also lead to administrative consequences such as adverse characterization of service or loss of military career opportunities. These ramifications exist independently of any parallel civilian proceedings and can occur even when civilian authorities decline to prosecute.
Unlike civilian domestic violence statutes, Article 128b is tailored to the military environment, defining domestic relationships and prohibited conduct through the lens of good order and discipline while incorporating elements not always mirrored in state law. Its scope, evidentiary standards, and jurisdictional reach differ from civilian systems, allowing commanders and courts‑martial to address misconduct that affects both personal welfare and military effectiveness.
Domestic violence and abuse under military law, defined in Article 128b UCMJ, involve harmful acts or threats toward a protected person. At Kadena Air Base, such allegations can quickly lead to administrative separation and court-martial proceedings. Gonzalez & Waddington provide legal guidance; call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
At Kadena Air Base, domestic violence and abuse allegations trigger rapid action because military personnel fall under mandatory reporting rules. Command, medical staff, security forces, and helping agencies must notify the appropriate offices immediately, which activates a structured command response designed to protect safety and comply with Air Force policy.
When an allegation is received, commanders may issue no-contact orders or separation directives to stabilize the situation while facts are gathered. Firearms restrictions can also be implemented under military regulations to reduce risk during the assessment period.
The installation’s command risk management process increases visibility and oversight to ensure that all involved parties are safe and that procedures are followed. This structured framework—focused on safety, compliance, and accountability—can make the response feel rapid and highly visible compared to civilian processes.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Many cases begin with relationship disputes or household conflict, where disagreements escalate into situations that lead someone to contact security forces. These scenarios often involve conflicting accounts from those involved, reflecting the stress and confusion present at the time rather than established facts.
Another frequent pattern involves third‑party reporting, such as neighbors, friends, or co‑workers requesting welfare checks after overhearing arguments or perceiving signs of distress. These reports may rely on limited observations and do not necessarily align with the perspectives of the individuals directly involved.
Alcohol use and emotional escalation also appear in numerous incident narratives. When combined with stress, fatigue, or ongoing relationship strain, statements made during these moments can be unclear, inconsistent, or influenced by the intensity of the situation rather than a precise recollection of events.
Domestic violence cases at Kadena Air Base typically involve coordinated efforts between military authorities and law enforcement to gather a clear factual record of what occurred. Investigators follow established procedures to document the incident, preserve relevant information, and compile materials necessary for command review or potential legal action.
The evidence collected during these inquiries often comes from multiple sources and is intended to create a comprehensive picture of events. The materials below represent the types of documentation commonly assembled during an investigation.
At Kadena Air Base, service members may face administrative separation even without a civilian or court-martial conviction when domestic violence allegations arise, because commanders can initiate action based on a perceived loss of trust, military readiness concerns, or substantiated information from investigations.
These cases frequently proceed through a Board of Inquiry or show-cause proceedings, where evidence is reviewed to determine whether continued service is warranted and whether the alleged conduct is incompatible with Air Force standards.
If separation is recommended, the discharge characterization can range from Honorable to Under Other Than Honorable Conditions, depending on the findings and the member’s overall record, and this characterization may influence post-service benefits.
Allegations can also trigger reviews of security clearances and professional qualifications, potentially limiting assignment options, promotion opportunities, and long-term career viability within the Air Force.
Domestic violence allegations within the military frequently trigger criminal military investigations, which determine whether the conduct violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice and whether charges should proceed. These investigations can run parallel to civilian inquiries and often shape the trajectory of any administrative or disciplinary measures that follow.
In addition to criminal inquiries, commanders may initiate command-directed investigations to assess immediate risks to good order and discipline, evaluate the service member’s fitness for duty, and gather information not limited to criminal misconduct. Findings from these inquiries can influence whether temporary restrictions, safety measures, or further administrative steps are implemented.
Depending on the evidence and the severity of the allegations, domestic violence cases can lead to administrative actions such as Letters of Reprimand, or escalate to Boards of Inquiry and court-martial proceedings. These processes determine whether adverse career consequences, separation, or judicial punishment is appropriate, illustrating how a single domestic violence allegation can interact with multiple layers of the military justice system.
Gonzalez & Waddington are frequently retained by service members at Kadena Air Base because of their deep experience handling relationship‑driven allegations, including cases involving complex interpersonal dynamics and conflicting statements. Their background allows them to navigate the sensitive nature of domestic violence and abuse accusations in a military environment.
The firm’s approach integrates both criminal and administrative defense, addressing actions that may arise simultaneously under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and Air Force administrative processes. This integrated strategy helps clients manage parallel investigations, command inquiries, and potential career consequences.
With decades of military justice experience, the firm is trained in the rigorous cross‑examination of witnesses and investigators, a critical component in contested domestic violence cases. Their familiarity with law enforcement protocols and investigative techniques enables them to probe the accuracy, consistency, and context of statements made during the investigative process.
Article 128b addresses domestic violence offenses within the military justice system. It defines specific conduct involving physical harm or certain prohibited behaviors within qualifying relationships. The article outlines elements that investigators and commanders may review during a case.
Administrative separation can occur independently of a court-martial process. Commands may initiate separation actions based on the service member’s record and the information collected during inquiries. This process follows administrative standards rather than criminal procedures.
No-contact orders are command-directed measures used to manage safety and maintain good order and discipline. They may set specific restrictions on communication or physical proximity. Their terms and duration depend on command decisions and ongoing investigations.
Federal law and DoD policies may restrict firearms access for individuals involved in certain domestic violence situations. These restrictions can apply when qualifying protective orders or findings are in place. Commands follow regulatory guidance when implementing any limitations.
Investigators can review statements, physical evidence, digital communications, and official reports. They may also consider information from medical personnel, security forces, or witnesses. The weight of each item is determined by the investigative and legal process.
Administrative actions can run parallel to or separate from criminal proceedings. Commands may take actions such as letters of counseling or administrative reviews based on available information. These actions follow military administrative standards rather than judicial ones.
Service members may consult with a civilian attorney alongside military defense counsel. Civilian lawyers can assist with understanding procedures or representing the member in non-military forums. Their participation depends on the case’s circumstances and the member’s preferences.
Kadena Air Base is located on the island of Okinawa in Japan’s Ryukyu archipelago, positioned between the East China Sea and the Pacific Ocean. The installation sits adjacent to the cities of Okinawa City and Chatan, with smaller surrounding communities woven closely around the base’s perimeter. Its subtropical climate, coastal terrain, and proximity to vital maritime routes shape both daily life and the strategic significance of the area. Kadena’s placement in the southernmost prefecture of Japan gives it a forward position within the Indo-Pacific region, enabling rapid response capability across Northeast and Southeast Asia. The interaction between the installation and nearby civilian neighborhoods is a defining feature of the island, as shared roads, businesses, and community facilities reflect decades of coexistence.
Kadena Air Base is the largest U.S. Air Force installation in the Indo-Pacific, hosting a mix of USAF, joint, and allied activities. Its core mission centers on airpower projection, deterrence, and regional security, supported by combat-ready fighter aircraft, airborne reconnaissance, and theater support units. Key operational elements include aviation, maintenance, intelligence, and command functions that enable sustained operations throughout the region. As a hub for rotational forces and joint exercises, Kadena plays a critical role in strengthening partnerships and maintaining readiness across the Pacific.
The installation supports a substantial active duty population along with family members, civilian employees, and allied personnel. Daily operations include flying missions, logistics support, aircraft maintenance, medical services, and theater-level command coordination. Because Kadena hosts both permanently assigned units and rotational aviation elements, the tempo can shift between routine operations and high-intensity activity tied to regional missions and deployments. This dynamic environment contributes to a constant state of readiness.
The operational tempo and multinational setting at Kadena Air Base create conditions where UCMJ issues can arise, including command-directed investigations, non-judicial punishment, administrative separation actions, and courts-martial. Service members assigned to or transiting through the installation may encounter legal challenges connected to deployment cycles, joint operations, off-base incidents, or regulatory requirements unique to Okinawa. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Kadena Air Base in these matters, providing guidance and advocacy when military justice concerns emerge.
A qualifying conviction can trigger federal firearm prohibitions under the Lautenberg Amendment, affecting both duty and personal firearms.
Punishments can include confinement, reduction in rank, forfeitures, punitive discharge, and other collateral consequences.
Yes, domestic violence allegations frequently result in administrative separation even without a criminal conviction.
Command discretion plays a major role in charging decisions, protective measures, and whether the case proceeds criminally or administratively.
Yes, a case can proceed even if the accuser recants if the command believes other evidence supports the allegation.
