Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale Article 120 Sexual Assault Court-Martial Lawyers
Table Contents
Article 120 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice outlines a range of sexual offenses, distinguishing between sexual assault—acts involving penetration without consent—and abusive sexual contact, which covers intentional, nonconsensual touching of specific body areas. These distinctions define the nature and severity of the alleged misconduct within the military justice system.
Both categories of offenses under Article 120 carry felony-level exposure at a general court-martial, reflecting the seriousness with which the military treats allegations involving violations of bodily autonomy and consent. Convictions may result in significant punitive measures imposed by the court-martial forum.
Prosecution of Article 120 offenses is controlled by the military chain of command, meaning Coast Guard leadership initiates and directs the investigative and prosecutorial process. Commanders determine how allegations proceed through the system, including referral decisions and the convening of courts-martial.
This command-driven structure differs notably from civilian systems, where independent prosecutors make charging decisions and pursue cases on behalf of the state. The military framework emphasizes order and discipline within the service, resulting in procedures and priorities distinct from those found in civilian criminal justice.
Article 120 covers felony-level sexual assault offenses in the military, often triggering rapid escalation from investigation to charges. At Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale, cases may involve expert evidence review and administrative separation risk. Gonzalez & Waddington provide defense guidance; call 1-800-921-8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale operates under a strict zero‑tolerance culture and well‑defined reporting obligations. When an Article 120 concern is raised, personnel are required to elevate the information through established channels, which increases the speed and formality of the response. This structured framework is designed to preserve safety, accountability, and trust within the unit.
The station’s operational pace and high visibility also contribute to rapid command involvement. Leaders must address potential risks promptly to maintain mission readiness and ensure that all members understand the process is being handled consistently with service policy. This emphasis on risk management can make the situation feel accelerated for those involved.
At the same time, administrative processes often run parallel to any investigative steps. Because Coast Guard policies allow for administrative reviews independent of judicial outcomes, a member may experience swift exposure to decisions related to assignment, permissions, or separation considerations. These processes are procedural in nature and are meant to protect both the individual and the unit while the matter is reviewed.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
Cases often involve situations where alcohol consumption leads to uncertainty or memory gaps among those involved. These scenarios may generate differing accounts of events, particularly when service members have limited recollection of key moments or rely on partial digital or witness-based reconstruction.
Another recurring pattern includes interactions that begin on dating apps or through digital communications. These exchanges can create a documented record of intentions or misunderstandings, and they may later be scrutinized to assess how conversations evolved before, during, and after an encounter.
Investigations also frequently reference the dynamics of barracks life or a close-knit unit, where social circles overlap and relationship disputes may arise. In some instances, third-party reporting—often from friends, roommates, or shipmates reacting to perceived changes in behavior or disputes—initiates official inquiry rather than a direct complaint.
Article 120 investigations at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale typically involve coordinated efforts between unit leadership and federal investigative agencies. These inquiries focus on gathering factual information, documenting the sequence of events, and identifying all individuals involved to build a comprehensive understanding of the allegations.
Investigators rely on a wide range of evidence-gathering methods and official procedures. The materials collected during these inquiries form the foundation of the case record and are used to establish what occurred, how it occurred, and the context surrounding the reported incident.
MRE 412 restricts evidence related to an alleged victim’s sexual behavior or sexual predisposition, making courts at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale focus closely on whether any such material has genuine relevance beyond its inherent prejudice.
MRE 413 and 414 allow the introduction of an accused’s prior sexual assault or child molestation conduct, permitting the government to present patterns of behavior that would otherwise be excluded under general propensity rules.
The motions filed under these rules and the subsequent admissibility determinations shape the structure of Article 120 trials, as parties litigate what contextual or historical information the members will be permitted to hear.
Evidentiary rulings under these provisions effectively define the case by determining the narrative boundaries, influencing what facts are emphasized, how witness testimony is framed, and which themes dominate the litigated events.
Article 120 cases at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale often hinge on expert analysis and credibility assessments, as prosecutors and defense counsel rely on specialized testimony to support or challenge allegations. These cases frequently involve technical, medical, and psychological considerations that require clarification for the factfinder.
Because credibility is often central to the outcome, expert testimony can play a decisive role in explaining complex evidence, identifying investigative flaws, and evaluating the reliability of statements made by both the complainant and the accused.
Service members at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale can face administrative separation based solely on Article 120 allegations, even in the absence of a conviction. Because administrative actions operate under a lower evidentiary threshold than courts-martial, commands may initiate separation proceedings when they believe the alleged conduct is incompatible with continued service.
These proceedings often take the form of a Board of Inquiry or show-cause process, where a panel evaluates the available information and determines whether separation is warranted. The board’s assessment focuses on whether the member’s conduct meets service standards, not on establishing criminal guilt.
If separation is recommended, the resulting discharge characterization—such as Honorable, General (Under Honorable Conditions), or Other Than Honorable—can significantly affect post-service opportunities. Characterization reflects the board’s view of the member’s overall performance and conduct.
The consequences of an adverse characterization may include limited access to veterans’ benefits, reduced employment opportunities, and impacts on retirement eligibility. For members nearing retirement, the loss of service credit can be a substantial and long‑lasting outcome of the administrative process.
Article 120 cases, which involve allegations of sexual assault and related misconduct, often intersect with broader sex crimes investigations conducted at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale. These investigations may run parallel to or precede formal legal proceedings, ensuring that command leadership and law enforcement gather sufficient facts before determining the appropriate administrative or judicial path.
In some situations, command-directed investigations play a significant role in clarifying whether an Article 120 allegation warrants further action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. These inquiries help commanders assess the impact on unit readiness and good order while maintaining compliance with Coast Guard procedures and victim-support requirements.
Depending on the findings, Article 120 cases may lead to administrative measures such as Letters of Reprimand or escalate to more consequential processes like Boards of Inquiry. These actions allow the command to address misconduct, evaluate an individual’s suitability for continued service, and reinforce standards of accountability at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale.
With decades of military justice experience, the firm draws on a deep understanding of Article 120 litigation to build focused trial strategies and identify targeted motions that can shape the trajectory of a case at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale. Their approach emphasizes careful analysis of the government’s evidence, early issue-spotting, and motion practice designed to challenge procedural or evidentiary weaknesses.
Defense preparation includes methodical cross-examination planning and expert witness impeachment, using forensic, medical, or digital specialists when necessary to scrutinize the reliability and interpretation of technical evidence. This process-centered method helps ensure that testimony and expert opinions are tested thoroughly in a courtroom setting.
Their attorneys have published extensively on trial advocacy, courtroom persuasion, and military justice practice, providing a scholarly foundation that informs their case preparation and in-court execution. Clients retain them with the expectation that this blend of academic contribution and long-term military justice experience will be applied directly to the demands of an Article 120 defense.
Article 120 addresses a range of sexual assault and sexual misconduct offenses under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It outlines prohibited behaviors, definitions, and the elements that must be evaluated during an investigation.
Consent is assessed based on whether a person freely agreed to the conduct without pressure, force, or impairment. Investigators look closely at verbal and nonverbal communication surrounding the incident.
Alcohol can factor into whether someone was capable of consenting and how events are interpreted. Evidence of intoxication is often reviewed to understand the level of impairment for all individuals involved.
Digital items such as messages, photos, and location data may be examined to establish timelines and communication. Investigators use this information to corroborate or challenge statements related to the alleged incident.
Experts can explain topics such as memory, trauma response, or forensic findings to provide context for the fact-finders. Their input may help clarify technical or scientific aspects of the evidence.
An allegation may prompt administrative review in addition to any criminal process. Such reviews evaluate conduct, suitability for continued service, and adherence to Coast Guard standards.
Investigations typically involve interviews, evidence collection, and coordination with Coast Guard and military justice authorities. The process aims to develop a full factual record before any further decisions are made.
A civilian attorney may participate alongside appointed military counsel if the service member chooses to retain one. Their involvement can include reviewing evidence, attending proceedings, or offering legal support within the rules that govern military justice.
Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale is located along the Intracoastal Waterway in South Florida, positioned between the Atlantic shoreline and the city’s dense maritime infrastructure. Its proximity to Port Everglades, one of the nation’s busiest cruise and cargo hubs, gives the station a uniquely demanding operational setting. The surrounding communities of Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Dania Beach create a blend of residential, commercial, and tourism-driven activity that directly influences maritime traffic and emergency response needs. The warm, tropical climate and year‑round boating culture further solidify the station’s role as a frontline presence in a region defined by heavy recreational, commercial, and international vessel movement.
The station is staffed by Coast Guard personnel whose mission centers on maritime safety, law enforcement, and search and rescue operations. Its location enables rapid response to offshore incidents, human migration events, drug interdiction, and environmental protection missions unique to South Florida’s busy coastline. While not a large multi-branch installation, the station works closely with Coast Guard Sector Miami, local first responders, and federal maritime partners to provide continuous coastal security coverage. Its crews support regular patrols and are often the first units activated during severe weather threats or port security contingencies.
The active-duty population at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale is relatively small compared to major military bases, but operational activity is high. Personnel conduct daily patrols, maintain fast-response vessels, and support missions that frequently extend into the Caribbean. The station does not host large training pipelines, yet it experiences steady rotation of crews, boarding teams, and operational specialists. Because of its strategic port-side location, members routinely interact with international vessel crews, federal agencies, and maritime industry partners, contributing to a demanding and fast-paced operational environment.
Service members assigned to or transiting through the station may encounter UCMJ matters ranging from investigations and command-directed inquiries to administrative actions, non-judicial punishment, or courts-martial. High operational tempo, boarding operations, and law enforcement duties can create situations where legal questions or incidents arise quickly. The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers stationed at Coast Guard Station Fort Lauderdale in matters involving military justice and administrative proceedings.
Intoxication alone does not prove sexual assault, despite how cases are often framed during investigations.
Alcohol does not automatically eliminate consent, and the analysis focuses on capacity, awareness, and the specific facts of the encounter.
Consent under Article 120 must be freely given and can be expressed through words or conduct, but it cannot exist if a person is legally incapable of consenting.
Sexual assault generally involves penetration or qualifying sexual acts, while abusive sexual contact involves non-penetrative sexual touching defined by the statute.
Article 120 of the UCMJ criminalizes sexual assault, abusive sexual contact, rape, and related offenses involving lack of consent or incapacity.
