Table Contents
Non‑Judicial Punishment, known across the services as Article 15 in the Army and Air Force, NJP in the Marine Corps and Coast Guard, and Captain’s Mast or Admiral’s Mast in the Navy, is a disciplinary process that allows commanders to address certain violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice without initiating a court‑martial. It serves as an administrative mechanism for enforcing standards and addressing misconduct within a unit.
Unlike a court‑martial, which is a formal judicial proceeding with prosecutors, defense counsel, and a full evidentiary process, NJP is not a criminal trial. It is conducted by a service member’s commander, follows streamlined procedures, and carries more limited punishments. The reduced formality and narrower range of potential consequences distinguish it from the judicial system used for more serious offenses.
NJP results in the creation of a permanent service record entry because the military documents all official disciplinary actions to maintain accountability and track a service member’s conduct history. These entries become part of a member’s personnel file, ensuring that the outcome of the proceeding is preserved for future administrative review and historical recordkeeping.
At Camp Schwab, Non‑Judicial Punishment (Article 15/NJP/Mast) is a formal disciplinary process, not minor corrective action, and can affect rank, pay, and long‑term career opportunities. Gonzalez & Waddington provide guidance on navigating NJP procedures. For assistance, call 1‑800‑921‑8607.
Watch the criminal defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend criminal cases and service members worldwide against Federal Charges, Florida State Charges, UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced criminal defense lawyers can make the difference.
At Camp Schwab, Non‑Judicial Punishment (NJP) is treated as a formal command action rather than minor discipline because it is imposed at the commander’s discretion and becomes highly visible within the unit. The decision to initiate NJP reflects a deliberate determination that the conduct requires official accountability, and the resulting record is accessible to leadership in ways that informal corrective measures are not.
NJP also carries career consequences that exceed those of minor corrective tools. An NJP entry can influence promotion eligibility, limit competitiveness for special duty assignments, and affect reenlistment opportunities. Because these outcomes are tied directly to personnel management systems, the impact of NJP extends beyond the immediate event.
Additionally, NJP at Camp Schwab often triggers follow‑on administrative review. The documentation generated during the NJP process may be used to inform decisions on counseling, probationary periods, or other administrative actions designed to address performance or conduct patterns. For these reasons, NJP is viewed as a substantial disciplinary measure rather than a minor one.
If you or a loved one is facing criminal charges or a criminal investigation by federal authorities, the military, or the State of Florida, early defense matters. Gonzalez & Waddington provide disciplined, trial-focused criminal defense for high-stakes cases involving serious allegations and complex evidence. To speak with experienced criminal defense lawyers and get confidential guidance, call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a no-cost, confidential consultation.
The Non-Judicial Punishment process at Camp Schwab follows a structured sequence designed to address alleged misconduct within the command. Each step outlines how information is reviewed, how decisions are made, and how actions are formally recorded.
This process establishes the progression from the initial report of misconduct to the administrative conclusion, detailing how commanders evaluate evidence and administer disciplinary measures.
Service members may face administrative discipline when they are alleged to have violated standing orders, such as liberty regulations, uniform requirements, or procedures related to equipment and accountability. These matters are typically handled through the NJP process to address expectations and reinforce adherence to command standards.
Alcohol-related incidents can also result in NJP when a Marine’s off‑duty decisions raise concerns about safety or good order. In such cases, the command uses administrative tools to correct behavior and emphasize responsible conduct without treating the situation as a criminal determination.
Issues involving professionalism, such as lapses in workplace conduct, tardiness, or failure to meet performance expectations, may likewise be addressed through NJP. This approach allows leaders to resolve concerns promptly and focus on improvement, mentoring, and readiness within the unit.
Statements and reports, such as service member entries, written explanations, and incident documentation, are often reviewed to establish the sequence of events and clarify each individual’s role in the alleged misconduct.
Investigative summaries compiled by military authorities, including preliminary inquiries or command-directed investigations, provide an overview of gathered facts and help frame the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Witness accounts from Marines, civilians, or other personnel are frequently considered, and commanders exercise discretion when deciding which pieces of evidence to weigh and how much significance to give each source during the proceeding.
Non-Judicial Punishment at Camp Schwab can result in formal documentation such as letters of reprimand, which may be placed in a service member’s record and influence subsequent decisions by commanders and administrative authorities.
When NJP findings raise concerns about a service member’s performance or conduct, commanders may initiate separation processing, beginning a review of the individual’s suitability for continued service.
Depending on rank, allegations, and prior history, a case can be routed to a Board of Inquiry or similar administrative separation board, creating a risk that the member will face a panel reviewing whether retention is appropriate.
Beyond the immediate administrative actions, these outcomes can create long-term career consequences, including reduced competitiveness for promotions, limited assignment opportunities, and barriers to reenlistment or continued service.
At Camp Schwab, Non‑Judicial Punishment (NJP) often works in conjunction with command-directed investigations, which typically serve as the fact-finding mechanism used to determine whether an NJP is appropriate. These investigations help commanders understand the circumstances of alleged misconduct before deciding on administrative or disciplinary action.
NJP may also be used alongside or in place of other administrative measures such as Letters of Reprimand. A Letter of Reprimand can accompany NJP when a commander wants to document misconduct more formally in a Marine’s record, or it may be issued independently when the situation does not rise to the level of punitive action.
When misconduct is more serious or repeated, NJP can become part of the evidentiary basis for initiating a Boards of Inquiry process, especially in cases involving retention or separation concerns. Likewise, if a case reveals conduct beyond the scope of NJP authority, the matter may escalate to a court‑martial, which serves as the formal judicial option for handling severe violations under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
Gonzalez & Waddington are frequently retained for Non‑Judicial Punishment matters at Camp Schwab because their practice is deeply rooted in administrative military defense. They understand how command decisions, brigade‑level procedures, and installation‑specific expectations shape NJP actions, allowing them to guide Marines through the process with clarity and precision.
Their experience extends beyond NJP itself, recognizing that adverse administrative actions often intersect with separation boards, administrative investigations, and long‑term career implications. This background allows them to help service members build a record that supports both immediate NJP response and any follow‑on administrative defense that may arise.
With decades of military justice experience, the firm emphasizes mitigation, documentation, and strategic advocacy. They focus on assembling coherent rebuttals, leveraging service history, and preserving issues for future review—all essential components for Marines seeking informed representation during NJP proceedings at Camp Schwab.
NJP is a command-level administrative action and not a criminal conviction. It addresses misconduct within the military system without creating a civilian criminal record.
NJP is a quicker, less formal process handled by a commander, while a court-martial is a judicial proceeding with formal rules of evidence. Court-martial findings can result in criminal convictions, unlike NJP.
NJP can include administrative penalties that may reduce rank or impact pay. The effects depend on the commander’s imposed punishment under applicable regulations.
NJP may be recorded in a service member’s personnel file, which can be reviewed during promotion boards. Its presence can lead to additional scrutiny during promotion assessments.
NJP itself is a standalone administrative action, but the underlying misconduct can be referenced in separation considerations. Command leadership may review NJP records when evaluating a member’s suitability for continued service.
The permanence of an NJP record depends on the branch’s regulations and how the command files it. Some entries may remain in long-term records while others may be stored in restricted files.
Service members are permitted to consult with a civilian attorney before deciding how to proceed with NJP. However, the ability of the lawyer to participate directly in the NJP hearing is limited by military regulations.
Camp Schwab sits along the northeastern coast of Okinawa, positioned near the rural communities of Henoko and Nago. Its coastal terrain combines dense subtropical forest with access to expansive training areas. The location provides both relative isolation for exercises and proximity to local towns that support daily installation activity.
The base’s position on Okinawa’s less-developed coastline gives units space for amphibious and ground maneuver training. Nearby civilian districts interact with the installation through shared infrastructure and commerce. This integration shapes how the base functions within the broader regional framework.
The United States Marine Corps is the primary tenant, using the installation as a hub for expeditionary and infantry-focused operations. The site supports rotational elements and specialized training aligned with Pacific-area readiness. Its mission contributes to broader Marine Corps posture in the region.
Camp Schwab hosts training events involving ground combat preparation, littoral operations, and unit integration. These activities reinforce rapid deployment capabilities for forces operating across the Indo-Pacific. The installation’s layout allows units to maintain a steady operational rhythm.
The population includes a mix of permanently assigned units and rotating elements tied to regional commitments. While comparatively smaller than some mainland bases, it maintains a constant flow of personnel engaged in mission preparation. This creates a dynamic environment shaped by ongoing training cycles.
Service members participate in field exercises, live-fire events, and readiness-focused evaluations. Support functions such as logistics, communications, and command operations sustain these efforts. The tempo varies with regional requirements and multinational coordination.
Those stationed at or rotating through the base may encounter UCMJ matters including investigations, administrative actions, NJP, courts-martial, or separation processes. The active training environment and operational demands can shape how such issues develop. Command structures on-site manage these actions in accordance with military regulations.
The military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington represent servicemembers at Camp Schwab in matters involving military justice. Their representation covers a range of actions arising from the installation’s operational and training conditions. Personnel may seek legal defense related to incidents occurring on or connected to the base.
Yes, NJP records can sometimes be introduced during sentencing or referenced in later administrative or separation proceedings. They are part of the service member’s official history.
The length of time NJP remains in a record depends on service regulations and filing decisions. In some cases, it can follow a service member for many years.
Yes, NJP is often considered during security clearance reviews and may be treated as adverse information. This can result in suspension or revocation of a clearance.
NJP can delay, block, or permanently affect promotions and selection for schools or special assignments. Promotion boards routinely review NJP records.
In many cases, a service member has the right to refuse NJP and demand trial by court-martial, though this depends on the circumstances and service branch. Refusal carries its own risks.
