Article 118 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is one of the most severe criminal charges a service member can face. Murder and attempted murder cases carry penalties ranging from decades of confinement to life imprisonment, dishonorable discharge, total loss of benefits, and in the most extreme cases, capital punishment. Allegations of homicide or attempted homicide draw immediate and overwhelming government attention—CID, NCIS, OSI, military prosecutors, medical examiners, forensic teams, and command officials mobilize quickly to build a case. Because these investigations begin with an assumption that “someone must be held accountable,” service members often find themselves facing biased investigators, flawed forensic interpretations, contradictory witness statements, and overwhelming pressure from command leadership. The complexity of these cases demands a defense team with unmatched experience, forensic knowledge, and courtroom skill. Gonzalez & Waddington, Attorneys at Law has defended some of the highest-profile homicide and attempted homicide cases in the modern military. Michael and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington are known for their mastery of forensic science, cross-examination, accident reconstruction, and narrative trial strategy. Their track record includes acquittals, reduced charges, and major victories in cases involving combat deaths, domestic incidents, training accidents, bar fights, vehicle deaths, and self-defense disputes. Article 118 includes four categories of murder, each with different elements the prosecution must prove: Each category demands a different defense approach. Premeditation, intent, recklessness, and causation become battlegrounds where legal skill often determines the outcome. Attempted murder requires proof of: Attempted murder cases often involve self-defense disputes, misinterpreted actions, accidental discharges, and emotionally charged domestic incidents. Homicide cases arise from a wide range of circumstances. Most are not cold-blooded murders—they are chaotic, emotionally charged, or accidental situations misinterpreted by investigators. The defense must show the truth behind what happened—not the simplified narrative investigators try to impose. Homicide cases receive extreme scrutiny in the military justice system. Investigators may be inexperienced with complex forensic evidence or pressured by the chain of command to “close the case quickly.” Complications often include: An Article 118 defense must aggressively confront these built-in disadvantages. Winning Article 118 cases requires a defense team skilled in forensic science, psychology, crime scene reconstruction, and tactical analysis. Self-defense is one of the strongest defenses against homicide. Many Article 118 cases arise from situations where the accused feared for their life or physical safety. Premeditation requires deliberate planning—not heat-of-the-moment actions. We dismantle weak premeditation theories piece by piece. We expose flawed medical examiner findings, unreliable trauma analysis, and alternative causes of death. Training environments, weapon handling, and high-stress situations often involve genuine accidents—not crimes. We use experts to analyze: CID, NCIS, and OSI frequently: Expert testimony often undermines government assumptions about intent or malice. Prosecutors frequently charge attempted murder in cases where there was: The defense must show that the government cannot prove the accused specifically intended to kill. These are life-defining cases. You need the strongest defense team available. Michael and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington are internationally recognized for their work in homicide and attempted-homicide defense. Their approach combines deep forensic knowledge with aggressive, strategic courtroom advocacy. If you are under investigation or charged with murder or attempted murder under Article 118, do not speak to investigators. Contact our defense team immediately. Your life, freedom, and future depend on it. ➤ Contact Gonzalez & Waddington for Immediate Article 118 Defense Yes. Self-defense is one of the strongest defenses in an Article 118 case. If the accused reasonably believed death or serious bodily harm was imminent, the use of deadly force may be justified. Our firm frequently wins murder cases using self-defense arguments and forensic reconstruction. No. Never speak to investigators without legal counsel. Murder investigators are trained to obtain confessions or damaging statements. Anything you say will be used against you. Contact our office immediately if approached by investigators. Yes. Attempted murder focuses on intent—not the outcome. However, prosecutors often overcharge. We frequently reduce attempted murder charges to lesser offenses by disproving intent or showing self-defense. Many Article 118 and Article 119 cases stem from accidents misinterpreted as crimes. We use expert accident reconstruction, medical analysis, and witness examination to prove lack of criminal intent. Because they are among the most experienced homicide-defense lawyers in the military justice system. Their expertise in forensic science, trial warfare, and cross-examination has led to major victories in cases worldwide.Military Defense for Article 118 UCMJ – Murder / Attempted Murder Cases
Elite Court-Martial Attorneys for Article 118 Murder & Attempted Murder Charges
Understanding Article 118 Murder Charges Under the UCMJ
Understanding Attempted Murder Under Article 80 / Article 118
Common Scenarios Leading to Article 118 Accusations
Typical Article 118 Situations Include:
Why Article 118 Cases Are High-Risk for the Accused
Defense Strategies for Article 118 Murder & Attempted Murder Cases
1. Proving Self-Defense or Defense of Another
2. Challenging Premeditation
3. Causation Attacks
4. Accident Defense
5. Crime Scene Reconstruction
6. Exposing Investigative Failure
7. Psychological and Behavioral Analysis
Why Attempted Murder Cases Are Often Overcharged
Penalties for Article 118 Murder or Attempted Murder
Why Choose Gonzalez & Waddington for Article 118 Defense
Contact Our Article 118 Murder Defense Lawyers
Article 118 Murder / Attempted Murder – Frequently Asked Questions
Can self-defense defeat a murder charge?
Should I speak to CID, NCIS, or OSI?
Can I be charged with attempted murder if no one was hurt?
What if the death was an accident?
Why hire Michael and Alexandra Gonzalez-Waddington?
Facing charges under Article 118 for murder or attempted murder within the military justice system is a serious matter that requires a detailed and dedicated legal defense. Our team is committed to guiding service members through these complex proceedings with a focus on protecting their rights and achieving the best possible outcomes. Understanding the nuances of military law and the specific circumstances surrounding each case is essential for effective defense.
Military justice cases involving allegations of murder or attempted murder carry significant consequences that can affect a service member’s career and freedom. It is important to approach these charges with careful legal strategy, addressing every detail and fact. We provide support and representation designed to navigate the military legal system thoroughly, ensuring that every angle of the case is examined and every defense opportunity is pursued.
A robust defense in cases involving Article 118 charges can make a significant difference in the final outcome. These cases demand careful investigation and a clear understanding of military law and procedures. With the right approach, it is possible to challenge the evidence presented, protect the rights of the accused, and work toward minimizing potential penalties. Timely and thorough legal support helps clients navigate these challenging situations with confidence.
Our firm provides focused defense services for military personnel facing serious charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Based in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, we understand the unique pressures and legal standards involved in military criminal cases. Our commitment is to supply service members with knowledgeable representation that addresses the specific demands of Article 118 cases and supports their rights throughout the process.
Article 118 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice covers charges of murder and attempted murder within the armed forces. These charges are among the most serious a service member can face, involving complex legal standards and procedures. Understanding how the military justice system approaches these cases is essential for anyone charged under this article.
This guide provides an overview of the key elements involved in Article 118 cases, including the definitions of murder and attempted murder, the legal processes involved, and the possible outcomes. Anyone facing such charges should seek comprehensive legal advice to fully understand their rights and defenses.
Murder under Article 118 refers to the unlawful killing of another person with intent, while attempted murder involves taking substantial steps toward committing murder without completing the act. Both charges carry severe penalties and require detailed proof of intent and actions. The military justice system applies these definitions within the context of service regulations and standards.
Prosecuting or defending an Article 118 charge involves several critical elements, including establishing intent, the circumstances of the act, and evidence assessment. The process typically includes investigation, pre-trial hearings, and potentially a court-martial. Each phase requires careful preparation and understanding of military legal protocols to ensure fair treatment and due process.
Familiarity with key terms can help clarify the complexities of Article 118 cases. This glossary defines essential concepts that are commonly encountered in military murder and attempted murder cases.
Article 118 is a section of the Uniform Code of Military Justice that addresses charges of murder and attempted murder among military personnel, outlining the legal definitions, penalties, and procedures for these offenses.
A court-martial is a military court responsible for trying members of the armed forces who are accused of violating military law, including serious charges like those under Article 118.
Intent refers to the purposeful decision to commit an act, such as unlawfully causing the death of another person, which is a necessary element in proving murder or attempted murder charges.
The UCMJ is the foundational set of laws that govern members of the United States military, including the rules and procedures for prosecuting offenses like murder and attempted murder.
Service members facing Article 118 charges may consider different legal strategies depending on the specifics of their case. Options range from negotiating plea agreements to preparing for a full court-martial trial. Each approach has benefits and risks that must be carefully weighed with professional guidance.
In some cases, the available evidence may be insufficient to support the charges fully. When this occurs, a targeted defense strategy that challenges the prosecution’s evidence and highlights inconsistencies can be effective in achieving a favorable outcome.
Early engagement with the military justice system can open pathways for negotiation and alternative resolutions, such as reduced charges or sentencing agreements. A focused approach in these situations can save time and reduce potential penalties.
When cases involve complicated facts, multiple witnesses, or extensive evidence, a comprehensive defense strategy is essential. This includes detailed investigation, expert testimony, and thorough case preparation to address every aspect of the prosecution’s claims.
Given the serious penalties associated with Article 118 charges, including possible imprisonment and discharge from service, a full and detailed defense is necessary to protect the service member’s future and rights.
A comprehensive legal approach ensures that every element of the case is reviewed and addressed. This thoroughness can uncover weaknesses in the prosecution’s case, identify procedural errors, and develop strong arguments that support the defense.
By engaging with all aspects of the military justice process, service members receive tailored representation designed to protect their interests in a manner that limited strategies may not provide. This approach often results in more favorable outcomes.
Conducting a detailed investigation allows the defense to verify facts, challenge evidence, and locate additional information that can support the client’s position. This process is critical in building a strong defense for Article 118 cases.
Comprehensive defense also involves managing all aspects of the case logistics, communicating clearly with the client, and providing guidance throughout the legal process. This holistic approach helps clients remain informed and involved in their defense.
Early legal intervention is important in Article 118 cases. Contacting a qualified military defense representative as soon as possible helps ensure that your rights are protected and that investigation and defense preparations begin promptly.
Keep open and honest communication with your defense team throughout the legal process. Providing accurate information and promptly responding to requests can improve the effectiveness of your defense.
Familiarizing yourself with the steps involved in the military justice system, from investigation to court-martial, can help you better navigate your case and prepare for what to expect.
Charges of murder or attempted murder under Article 118 carry significant consequences that impact a service member’s life and career. Specialized defense tailored to military law is vital to ensure rights are upheld and the best possible defense is presented.
Having legal representation familiar with the UCMJ and military court procedures can provide strategic advantages and comprehensive support during every phase of the case.
Service members may face Article 118 charges due to various incidents, including alleged deadly force during military operations, disputes escalating to violence, or accusations arising from off-duty conduct. Each circumstance requires careful legal evaluation and defense preparation.
In some cases, service members are charged following incidents during combat or operational duties where deadly force was used. These situations often involve complex factual and legal considerations unique to military contexts.
Conflicts arising between military personnel can sometimes result in serious charges, including murder or attempted murder. Proper defense requires addressing the underlying facts and circumstances thoroughly.
Charges can also result from actions taken during off-duty hours that violate the UCMJ. These cases often involve civilian law enforcement and require coordinated legal defense strategies.
