Does JAG Experience Really Matter When Hiring a Military Defense Lawyer?

Does JAG Experience Really Matter When Hiring a Military Defense Lawyer?

When facing a court-martial, one of the most critical decisions you will make is choosing the right defense attorney. Many service members naturally gravitate toward attorneys with prior military experience, particularly those who have served in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps (JAG). But does JAG experience truly guarantee superior defense in military criminal cases? In this article, we dive into the nuances of hiring a military defense lawyer and analyze why the type of military experience matters more than the mere fact of having served.

Understanding Military Defense Representation

Military law is a specialized field governed by the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Navigating court-martial proceedings requires an attorney well-versed in military legal procedures, customs, and the unique aspects of service member rights. Naturally, attorneys who have served as JAG officers are assumed to have an advantage due to their insider knowledge.

However, as Michael Waddington, a seasoned court-martial attorney, points out, “Military service in and of itself does not make someone a great attorney.” The key question isn’t just whether an attorney served in the military, but what kind of military service they performed—especially regarding trial experience.

Why All Military Experience Is Not Equal

Attorneys with JAG backgrounds can have vastly different roles during their service. Some might have spent most of their careers handling administrative duties, legal advising, or other non-trial functions. Others may have extensive experience defending criminal cases at courts-martial while on active duty. When hiring a military defense lawyer, this distinction is crucial.

  • Trial Experience Matters: An attorney who has actively defended courts-martial cases understands courtroom dynamics, evidentiary rules, and military-specific defenses. This practical trial experience can directly impact the quality of your defense.
  • Non-Trial Roles: An attorney who primarily served in non-trial positions may lack hands-on trial skills, even if they have impressive military credentials. This gap could affect their ability to aggressively and effectively defend you.

Therefore, when interviewing potential attorneys, it’s important to ask detailed questions about their military roles. For example:

“What was your role during your military service?”

“How many courts-martial did you defend or prosecute?”

“Can you describe the types of cases you handled while on active duty?”

The Benefits of Civilian Defense Counsel with Military Experience

In many cases, attorneys who have transitioned from JAG service into civilian defense practice bring a unique combination of skills. They combine insider knowledge of military law with aggressive civilian defense tactics, which can be a winning formula.

Michael Waddington emphasizes that prior JAG experience alone doesn’t guarantee an attorney will be a hard-hitting advocate. Civilian defense attorneys with military backgrounds who have honed their trial skills outside the military justice system often provide more vigorous representation.

Additionally, civilian defense counsel can sometimes offer a fresh perspective on military cases, challenging procedures or evidence with different methodologies than those traditionally used within military courts.

Additional Considerations When Hiring a Military Defense Lawyer

  • Reputation and Track Record: Research an attorney’s past case outcomes and client testimonials.
  • Communication Style: Choose an attorney who communicates clearly and is responsive to your concerns.
  • Specialization: Some military defense lawyers specialize in particular areas, such as sexual assault allegations, drug offenses, or fraud. Make sure their expertise aligns with your case.

Conclusion: Look Beyond the JAG Title

While prior military service and JAG experience can be valuable assets when selecting a military defense attorney, they should not be the sole deciding factors. The type and depth of trial experience, combined with a strong civilian defense practice, often translate into better representation. Always perform due diligence by asking detailed questions about an attorney’s military role, trial experience, and defense approach.

If you or a loved one faces a court-martial, consider consulting with attorneys who have proven trial experience both inside and outside the military. For expert assistance, you can contact civilian defense counsel like Michael Waddington and his team, who specialize in UCMJ defense and offer personalized, aggressive representation.

Learn more about military defense attorneys and your rights here.

Full Transcription

Prior military service is beneficial if you're facing a court-martial. However, the question really is, what type of military service is it? For example, if the attorney that you're speaking with has an extensive background in defending criminal cases while on active duty, then that is a plus for you. Military service in and of itself does not make someone a great attorney. Prior JAG experience does not make someone an aggressive, hard-hitting, civilian defense attorney. That's why when you're interviewing your attorney, you have to ask them what they did in the military. If they tell you they spent 20 years on active duty in the military, therefore they're the attorney to defend you, you have to ask them, well, what exactly did you do on active duty? And here's something you should be careful with. If the attorney spent most of their career in non-trial positions, then that's something you should consider.