Gonzalez & Waddington Law Firm
Facebook Youtube Instagram Linkedin Yelp Google
Call 1-800-921-8607 or text 954-909-7407 to request a consultation

800-921-8607

Get a Free Consultation 24/7

800-921-8607

Get a Free Consultation 24/7

800-921-8607

Command-Directed Investigation Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys

Command-Directed Investigation Defense Lawyers – UCMJ Attorneys

A command-directed investigation is one of the most misunderstood and dangerous processes in the military justice system. Service members are often told these investigations are “administrative,” “non-criminal,” or “just fact-finding.” In reality, command-directed investigations routinely become the foundation for adverse administrative action, separation, loss of clearance, or later criminal charges.

The biggest risk is not the investigation itself. It is what you say, how the investigation is framed, and how the findings are later used against you. Experienced UCMJ defense attorneys intervene early to protect rights, limit exposure, and prevent administrative investigations from becoming career-ending events.

Aggressive Military Defense Lawyers: Gonzalez & Waddington

Watch the military defense lawyers at Gonzalez & Waddington break down how they defend service members worldwide against UCMJ allegations, CID/NCIS/OSI investigations, court-martials, Article 120 cases, administrative separations, and GOMORs. If you’re under investigation or facing charges, this video explains what your rights are and how experienced civilian military counsel can make the difference.

What Is a Command-Directed Investigation?

A command-directed investigation is an inquiry ordered by a commander to examine allegations, incidents, or concerns involving a service member or unit. Unlike criminal investigations conducted by CID, NCIS, OSI, or CGIS, these investigations are typically run by an appointed investigating officer who answers directly to the command.
  • Often initiated without probable cause
  • Conducted by non-law enforcement officers
  • Broad in scope and loosely defined
  • Focused on command decision-making, not neutrality
Despite being labeled “administrative,” the consequences can be severe and permanent.

Quick links to deeper investigation resources

Common Triggers for Command-Directed Investigations

  • Allegations of misconduct that command does not want to refer immediately
  • Sexual harassment or hostile work environment complaints
  • Fraternization or unprofessional relationship allegations
  • Social media or speech-related issues
  • Alcohol-related incidents
  • Safety violations or duty performance issues
  • Anonymous complaints or third-party reports
These investigations often begin before the service member even knows they are under scrutiny.

The Biggest Myth: “It’s Not Criminal, So I Have to Talk”

One of the most damaging misconceptions is that service members must freely answer all questions in a command-directed investigation. While commanders may compel statements under certain conditions, those statements come with legal limits that are frequently ignored or improperly explained.
  • Compelled statements cannot be used criminally
  • But they can be used administratively
  • Improper warnings can eliminate protections
  • Statements are often shared outside their lawful scope
Without legal guidance, service members routinely waive protections they never knew existed.

Garrity, Kalkines, and Article 31(b) Issues

Command-directed investigations exist in a legal gray zone where multiple protections may apply. The problem is not the law. The problem is that commands and investigating officers often get it wrong.
  • Article 31(b) warnings may still be required
  • Compelled statements must be clearly identified
  • Improper mixing of compelled and voluntary statements contaminates cases
  • Later criminal investigators often rely on tainted information
A UCMJ defense attorney ensures the correct warnings are given and prevents unlawful crossover between administrative and criminal processes.

How Command-Directed Investigations Are Used Against You

Even when no criminal charges follow, command-directed investigations are frequently recycled into other adverse actions.
  • Letters of reprimand or GOMORs
  • Adverse evaluations or fitness reports
  • Denial of promotion, PCS, or schooling
  • Security clearance suspension or revocation
  • Administrative separation proceedings
Once findings are finalized, reversing the damage becomes exponentially harder.

Lack of Due Process in Command Investigations

Command-directed investigations are not trials. There are no rules of evidence, no cross-examination, and no neutral judge. Investigating officers often:
  • Rely on hearsay
  • Ignore exculpatory evidence
  • Fail to interview defense witnesses
  • Accept allegations at face value
  • Draft conclusions before completing interviews
Without defense intervention, these flaws go unchallenged.

Your Rights During a Command-Directed Investigation

Service members retain critical rights, even in administrative investigations.
  • The right to consult with counsel before making statements
  • The right to understand whether a statement is voluntary or compelled
  • The right to proper warnings before questioning
  • The right to refuse consent to searches
  • The right to challenge improper use of statements
These rights only protect you if they are asserted correctly.

When Command Investigations Turn Criminal

It is common for information from command-directed investigations to be quietly forwarded to criminal investigators. This often happens when:
  • Statements suggest potential UCMJ violations
  • Command becomes dissatisfied with administrative options
  • External pressure increases
  • New leadership takes over
Early legal intervention can prevent this handoff or preserve suppression issues if it occurs.

Why Early Defense Involvement Matters

Most service members contact a lawyer after the investigation is complete. By then, the damage is often done. A command-directed investigation defense lawyer can:
  • Control the scope of questioning
  • Prevent improper compelled statements
  • Ensure warnings are legally sufficient
  • Identify investigative bias
  • Position the case for favorable administrative outcomes

Global Command-Directed Investigations

Command-directed investigations occur worldwide, including overseas and deployed environments. SOFA agreements, host-nation sensitivities, and remote commands increase the risk of procedural shortcuts. Experienced UCMJ attorneys understand how to protect rights in these environments.

Immediate Steps If You Are Facing a Command-Directed Investigation

  • Do not give statements without legal advice
  • Clarify whether questioning is voluntary or compelled
  • Do not consent to searches
  • Preserve all communications and records
  • Contact a UCMJ defense attorney immediately

Speak With a Command-Directed Investigation Defense Lawyer

Command-directed investigations are not harmless. They are often the first step toward separation, loss of clearance, or criminal exposure. Early, informed defense action is the difference between containment and catastrophe.

Military Administrative Defense Lawyers – U.S. States & Federal Jurisdictions

Military Administrative Defense Lawyers – Overseas Regions & Countries

Military Administrative Defense Lawyers – Major Installations & Commands

Table of Contents