Understanding Defense Against Article 90 Charges at Submerged Lands Naval Base Guam
Facing accusations under Article 90 of the UCMJ for assaulting or disobeying a superior officer can profoundly impact your military career. At Submerged Lands Naval Base Guam, located in the U.S. territory of Guam near the city of Hagåtña, these charges require a knowledgeable defense approach tailored to the unique military judicial system. Our firm is prepared to guide you through this challenging legal process with clear, diligent support.
Military legal proceedings differ significantly from civilian courts, and charges related to assault or disobedience against a superior officer carry severe consequences. Understanding your rights and the complexities of military law at Submerged Lands NBG is essential. We focus on providing thorough representation to help you navigate investigations and trials, aiming to protect your future and uphold your dignity throughout the process.
Why Effective Defense Matters for Article 90 Charges
An informed defense against Article 90 charges ensures that your case is carefully evaluated, evidence is scrutinized, and your side of the story is presented clearly. Effective legal support helps mitigate potential punishments and can influence the outcome significantly. Understanding the nuances of military law and the specific procedures at Submerged Lands NBG allows for strategic planning that can protect your rights and career.
About Our Military Defense Firm and Attorneys
Our firm, based in Florida, offers dedicated military defense services including representation for cases at Submerged Lands NBG, Guam. The attorneys at UCMJ Defense, also known as Waddington and Gonzalez, are committed to assisting service members facing disciplinary action. With extensive knowledge of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and military court procedures, we provide a vigorous defense designed to address each case’s unique circumstances.
Comprehensive Guide to Article 90 Defense at Submerged Lands NBG
Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice addresses assaulting or willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer. Charges under this article are serious and can lead to significant penalties including confinement and dishonorable discharge. This guide will help you understand the legal definitions, potential defenses, and procedural steps involved in these military cases at Submerged Lands Naval Base Guam.
Navigating the military justice system requires attention to detail and awareness of the rights afforded to service members. Our guide breaks down the key elements of Article 90 offenses and outlines what to expect during investigations, hearings, and trials. We emphasize the importance of prompt legal consultation to ensure that your rights are protected from the outset.
What Constitutes Assaulting or Disobeying a Superior Officer?
Article 90 offenses involve either assaulting a superior commissioned officer or willfully disobeying lawful orders given by such an officer. Assault may include physical violence or attempts thereof, while disobedience entails refusing to carry out lawful commands. The military justice system treats these offenses seriously due to their impact on discipline and order within the armed forces, especially at a strategic location like Submerged Lands NBG.
Key Elements and Legal Procedures in Article 90 Cases
To establish guilt under Article 90, the prosecution must prove that the accused assaulted or willfully disobeyed a superior officer with knowledge of their rank and authority. The legal process includes investigation, preferral of charges, an Article 32 hearing, and potentially a court-martial. Each stage offers opportunities to challenge evidence and assert defenses, making skilled representation critical for service members at Submerged Lands NBG.
Glossary of Key Terms Related to Article 90 Defense
Understanding military legal terminology is essential when facing charges under Article 90. Below are definitions of important terms to help clarify the legal process and concepts involved in your defense.
Article 90
Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice specifically addresses assaulting or willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer, outlining punishments for these offenses within the military justice framework.
Court-Martial
A court-martial is a military court responsible for trying service members accused of violations of the UCMJ, including serious offenses like those under Article 90.
Superior Commissioned Officer
A superior commissioned officer is a military officer who holds a higher rank and authority over the accused, and whose lawful orders must be obeyed.
Article 32 Hearing
An Article 32 hearing is a pre-trial investigation designed to determine if there is sufficient evidence to proceed to a court-martial for military offenses.
Comparing Legal Defense Options for Article 90 Charges
Service members charged under Article 90 may consider different approaches to defense, including limited counsel or comprehensive representation. Limited counsel might focus on specific aspects of the case, while a comprehensive approach addresses all facets from investigation through trial. Understanding these options helps in selecting the most effective strategy to protect your rights and future at Submerged Lands NBG.
When Limited Defense Representation May Be Appropriate:
Minor or Uncontested Issues
A limited defense approach may be appropriate when the charge involves minor allegations or when the facts are largely uncontested, focusing on negotiation or mitigation rather than full trial defense.
Early Resolution Possible
If the case is likely to resolve early through administrative actions or plea agreements, limited counsel can help navigate these outcomes efficiently without engaging in a full legal battle.
The Importance of a Full-Service Defense for Article 90 Charges:
Complex or Serious Allegations
Serious charges involving assault or willful disobedience require thorough defense efforts, including investigation, evidence gathering, and trial preparation to protect your military career and personal rights.
Potential for Significant Penalties
Given the severe sanctions that may result from Article 90 convictions, comprehensive legal representation helps ensure your case is presented with the strongest possible defense.
Advantages of Choosing Comprehensive Defense Representation
A comprehensive defense strategy addresses every stage of the military justice process, from initial investigation through court-martial. This approach provides a cohesive and coordinated defense that maximizes your chances of a favorable outcome.
By engaging thorough case analysis and strategic planning, comprehensive representation reduces the risk of overlooked evidence or procedural errors, safeguarding your rights and future in the military.
Thorough Investigation and Evidence Review
Comprehensive defense ensures that all evidence is meticulously examined, including witness statements and military records, to build a strong case tailored to the facts surrounding your charge at Submerged Lands NBG.
Dedicated Trial Preparation and Advocacy
Full-service representation provides focused preparation for court-martial proceedings, enabling skilled advocacy to challenge prosecution claims and present your defense effectively.
As Featured On:
NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?
Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.
Top Searched Keywords
- Article 90 Defense Lawyer Guam
- Military Assault Defense Submerged Lands NBG
- Disobeying Superior Officer Legal Help Guam
- UCMJ Defense Attorney Guam
- Military Court Defense Naval Base Guam
- Submerged Lands NBG Military Lawyer
- Assault on Superior Officer Defense Guam
- Military Legal Defense Guam
- Guam Military Defense Firm
Pro Tips for Navigating Article 90 Charges at Submerged Lands NBG
Act Quickly and Seek Legal Guidance
Promptly consulting with a defense lawyer familiar with military law at Submerged Lands NBG can help preserve your rights and lay the groundwork for a strong defense.
Document Everything Relevant
Understand the Military Justice Process
Familiarizing yourself with the steps involved in military charges and court-martial proceedings helps reduce uncertainty and prepares you for what lies ahead.
Why You Should Consider Defense Representation for Article 90 Charges
Facing charges under Article 90 can lead to severe consequences, including imprisonment and discharge from military service. Having knowledgeable defense representation ensures that your case is handled with the seriousness it deserves, helping to navigate the complex military legal system effectively.
Defense counsel familiar with Submerged Lands NBG and military procedures can advocate for your rights, work to reduce potential penalties, and provide guidance that helps you make informed decisions throughout the process.
Typical Situations That Lead to Article 90 Defense Needs
Service members may require defense representation when accused of physical altercations with superior officers, refusal to obey lawful orders, or misunderstandings that escalate into formal charges. Each circumstance demands a tailored approach to ensure your side of the story is heard and your rights protected.
Alleged Physical Assault on a Superior Officer
Incidents involving claims of physical violence against a commanding or commissioned officer often trigger Article 90 charges, necessitating immediate legal defense to address the allegations effectively.
Willful Disobedience of Lawful Orders
Refusing to follow a lawful order from a superior officer can result in serious disciplinary action under Article 90, making it vital to have legal representation to navigate the military justice system.
Misunderstandings Leading to Formal Charges
Situations where miscommunication or conflict leads to accusations of assault or disobedience require careful investigation and defense to clarify facts and protect your career.
Meet Your Defense Team
Michael S. Waddington
Criminal Defense Lawyer
PARTNER
Alexandra González-Waddington
Criminal Defense Lawyer
PARTNER
Battle-Tested Results
Recent Case Results
Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer
U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,
Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan
U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max
Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges
U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to
Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell
U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex
Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama
U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations
Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg
U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming
Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year
U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA
Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2
Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape
U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration
Take Command of Your Defense
Why Service Members Rely on UCMJ Defense Lawyers for Article 90 Cases
Call Us Today
Check Out Our Newest Book
UCMJ Survival Guide
UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers
Worldwide Military Defense Experience
Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation
Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses
War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense
Media and High-Profile Case Experience
Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets
Playlist
3:34
7:32
6:57
7:58
21:35
7:24
4:24
Frequently Asked Questions About Article 90 Defense at Submerged Lands NBG
What penalties can result from an Article 90 conviction?
Convictions under Article 90 can lead to severe penalties, including confinement, reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay, and dishonorable discharge. The exact punishment depends on the circumstances of the offense and the findings of the court-martial. It is important to have legal representation to help mitigate these outcomes. The military justice system is designed to maintain discipline, so penalties can be more stringent than in civilian courts. Early legal intervention is critical to explore all possible defense strategies and reduce potential consequences.
How soon should I contact a defense lawyer after being charged?
It is crucial to contact a defense lawyer as soon as possible after being charged under Article 90. Early consultation allows your attorney to review the facts, advise you on your rights, and begin building a defense promptly. Delaying legal assistance can limit your options and affect the outcome of your case. Immediate legal guidance helps ensure that critical evidence is preserved and that you are properly represented throughout the military justice process.
Can I refuse orders if I believe they are unlawful?
While service members are required to obey lawful orders, there are circumstances in which an order may be considered unlawful. Refusing to obey an unlawful order is sometimes permissible, but this can be a complex issue requiring careful legal analysis. Consulting with a defense lawyer can help determine whether an order qualifies as unlawful and advise on the best course of action to protect your rights without compromising your military obligations.
What is the role of an Article 32 hearing in my case?
An Article 32 hearing serves as a preliminary investigation to determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed to a court-martial. It provides an opportunity for the defense to review the evidence and challenge the prosecution’s case. This hearing is a critical stage in the military justice process, allowing for early identification of weaknesses in the case and possible dismissal or reduction of charges before trial.
Are there defenses available against assault or disobedience charges?
There are various defenses available against Article 90 charges, including lack of intent, mistaken identity, or the order being unlawful. Each case requires a thorough examination of the facts and evidence to develop a tailored defense strategy. Legal representation can help identify applicable defenses and advocate on your behalf to achieve the most favorable resolution possible.
How does the military justice system differ from civilian courts?
The military justice system differs from civilian courts in its procedures, rules, and focus on maintaining discipline within the armed forces. Military courts often operate under the Uniform Code of Military Justice and have specialized processes such as courts-martial and Article 32 hearings. Understanding these differences is essential for effective defense, as military law incorporates unique standards and consequences that impact service members distinctly compared to civilian legal systems.
Can my defense lawyer represent me at a court-martial?
Yes, your defense lawyer can represent you at all stages of the military judicial process, including court-martial proceedings. Experienced military defense attorneys are familiar with the specific rules and protocols governing these trials. Having legal counsel present at court-martial ensures that your rights are protected, and that your defense is presented competently and effectively in front of the military judges and panel members.
What should I do if I’m accused of assaulting a superior officer?
If accused of assaulting a superior officer, it is important to remain calm and seek immediate legal counsel. Avoid making statements or admissions without your lawyer present, as anything you say can be used against you. Your lawyer will guide you through the process, help preserve evidence, and develop a defense strategy tailored to your situation to protect your rights and future.
Is it possible to have charges reduced or dismissed?
It is possible to have charges reduced or dismissed depending on the evidence and circumstances of your case. Early and effective legal defense plays a vital role in identifying weaknesses in the prosecution’s case or procedural errors. Negotiations with military prosecutors or presenting strong defense evidence can lead to favorable outcomes such as lesser charges or case dismissal.
How long does the military legal process usually take?
The duration of the military legal process varies widely based on the complexity of the case, availability of evidence, and scheduling of hearings or trials. Some cases may resolve in a few months, while others take longer due to appeals or extensive investigation. Early legal intervention helps streamline the process by addressing issues promptly, ensuring your defense is well-prepared for each stage of the proceedings.