Understanding Article 90 Charges Under the UCMJ
Facing charges under Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for assaulting or disobeying a superior officer is a serious matter that requires knowledgeable legal support. Located near Bremerton, Washington, our defense attorneys specialize in handling these complex military cases. We understand the unique aspects of military law and the consequences that can follow such accusations.
The military justice system operates differently from civilian courts, making it essential to have skilled representation familiar with UCMJ Article 90 allegations. Whether you are stationed at or near the Bremerton Navy base in Washington State or in the surrounding areas, our team is committed to protecting your rights and mounting a vigorous defense tailored to your circumstances.
Why Effective Defense Matters in Article 90 Cases
An Article 90 charge can result in severe penalties including confinement, reduction in rank, or even dishonorable discharge. Engaging a knowledgeable defense lawyer early in the process is essential to navigate the military justice procedures effectively. Our approach focuses on thorough case analysis, safeguarding your rights, and seeking the best possible outcome through negotiation or trial.
About Our Military Defense Law Firm
UCMJ Defense, based in Florida, provides dedicated legal representation for service members facing military criminal charges. Our attorneys have extensive experience defending clients accused under Article 90, offering guidance specific to the military context. We pride ourselves on personalized attention and a deep understanding of military discipline and court-martial processes.
Guide to Defending Article 90 Assault or Disobedience Charges
This guide provides an overview of charges related to assaulting or disobeying a superior officer under Article 90 of the UCMJ. It explains the legal definitions, potential consequences, and the importance of skilled defense representation. Understanding these elements can help service members prepare for the challenges of military legal proceedings.
Navigating the military justice system requires knowledge of both legal standards and military customs. This guide outlines the process from investigation to trial, highlighting critical steps where legal support can influence the case outcome. Our goal is to empower clients with information and effective defense strategies.
What Constitutes Assault or Disobedience Under Article 90
Article 90 addresses willful assault or disobedience directed at a superior commissioned officer. This includes acts such as striking, willfully disobeying lawful orders, or showing disrespect in a manner that undermines military authority. The charges carry significant weight as they challenge the chain of command, a fundamental aspect of military discipline.
Key Aspects of an Article 90 Charge
To prove an Article 90 violation, the prosecution must establish that the accused intentionally assaulted or disobeyed a superior officer and that the officer was acting lawfully at the time. Defense strategies often focus on disproving intent, questioning the legality of orders, or providing context that reduces culpability. Understanding these components is vital for mounting an effective defense.
Glossary of Important Terms Related to Article 90
This section explains key military legal terms that frequently arise in Article 90 cases. Familiarity with these terms can help clients better comprehend the charges and the defense process.
Article 90
Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice prohibits assaulting or willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer. It is designed to maintain order and discipline within the military hierarchy.
Court-Martial
A court-martial is a military court that tries members of the armed forces for breaches of military law, including Article 90 offenses.
Superior Officer
A superior officer is a commissioned officer who holds a higher rank or command authority over the accused service member.
Willful Disobedience
Willful disobedience refers to the intentional refusal or failure to obey a lawful order given by a superior officer.
Legal Options for Defending Article 90 Charges
Service members facing Article 90 charges can consider various defense approaches, including negotiation for lesser charges, presenting evidence to refute allegations, or proceeding to trial. Each option carries different risks and benefits, and selecting the right strategy depends on the case specifics and client goals.
When a Targeted Defense Strategy May Be Adequate:
Minor or Circumstantial Allegations
In cases where evidence of assault or disobedience is weak or based on misunderstandings, a focused defense challenging specific elements of the charge may suffice. This approach can help avoid prolonged legal proceedings while protecting the service member’s record.
Early Plea Negotiations
Engaging in early discussions with prosecutors can sometimes lead to reduced charges or alternative resolutions. A limited defense approach can effectively manage these negotiations without the need for a full trial.
The Importance of a Thorough Defense in Complex Cases:
Serious or Multiple Charges
When facing multiple allegations or serious charges that could end a military career, comprehensive legal support ensures all aspects of the case are addressed. This includes detailed investigation, expert testimony, and robust trial preparation.
Complex Legal and Factual Issues
Some Article 90 cases involve complicated facts or questions about the legality of orders. A thorough defense evaluates all evidence and legal nuances to build the strongest possible case for the accused.
Advantages of Comprehensive Defense Strategies
A comprehensive defense approach provides a full review of the case facts, including gathering witness statements, analyzing military regulations, and identifying procedural errors. This thoroughness can uncover weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and open opportunities for dismissal or reduced charges.
By addressing all potential issues proactively, a comprehensive defense also helps mitigate the impact on a service member’s career and personal life. It maximizes the chances of a favorable outcome, whether through negotiation or court-martial trial.
Holistic Case Evaluation
Examining every detail of the charge and the surrounding circumstances allows defense counsel to craft nuanced arguments and present a compelling case to military authorities.
Stronger Negotiation Position
A well-prepared defense improves credibility in plea discussions, which can lead to more favorable resolutions without the need for trial.
As Featured On:
NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?
Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.
Top Searched Keywords
- Article 90 Defense Lawyer Washington
- Military Assault Defense Bremerton
- UCMJ Article 90 Charges
- Disobeying Superior Officer Defense
- Navy Military Defense Attorney
- Court Martial Defense Washington State
- Military Criminal Defense Law Firm
- Bremerton Navy Base Legal Defense
- Uniform Code of Military Justice Defense
Tips for Navigating Article 90 Charges
Understand the Charge Thoroughly
Take time to comprehend the specific allegations under Article 90 and how they apply to your situation. Clarify any doubts with your legal counsel to ensure you know the potential consequences and defense options.
Respond Promptly to Legal Proceedings
Maintain Professional Conduct
Avoid actions or statements that could be misconstrued or used against you. Upholding discipline and professionalism supports a positive defense posture throughout the case.
Why Choose Our Defense Services for Article 90 Cases
Our firm offers dedicated representation for military personnel facing Article 90 charges, with a focus on understanding the complexities of military law and the serious implications of these accusations. We provide personalized attention and strategic defense planning to protect your rights and future.
Located in Florida but serving clients nationwide, including those near Bremerton, Washington, we combine extensive knowledge of the UCMJ with a commitment to client advocacy. Our attorneys strive to achieve the best possible outcomes through thorough case evaluation and aggressive representation.
Typical Situations Leading to Article 90 Charges
Article 90 charges often arise from incidents involving heated confrontations, misunderstandings of orders, or alleged insubordination during military duties. These situations can quickly escalate and require immediate legal attention to prevent severe disciplinary actions.
Disputes with Superior Officers
Conflicts with commanding officers, whether verbal or physical, can lead to accusations of assault or disobedience under Article 90. Such disputes may occur during stressful assignments or in high-pressure environments.
Misinterpretation of Orders
Sometimes service members are accused of willful disobedience when there is confusion or misunderstanding about a lawful order. Clarifying intent and context is vital in these cases.
Alleged Physical Assault
Physical altercations with superior officers, even if accidental or provoked, can result in serious Article 90 charges requiring a strong defense to challenge the allegations and facts.
Meet Your Defense Team
Michael S. Waddington
Criminal Defense Lawyer
PARTNER
Alexandra González-Waddington
Criminal Defense Lawyer
PARTNER
Battle-Tested Results
Recent Case Results
Gang-Rape Allegation Collapses Against Navy Officer
U.S. v. Navy O-2 – Norfolk, Virginia – Pre-Charge Defense Allegations: Rape, Conspiracy, Indecent Acts, Fraternization, Adultery, Conduct Unbecoming Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal,
Facebook Exposé Shuts Down Fake Rape Allegation in Japan
U.S. v. Marine E-6 – Iwakuni Air Base, Japan – Article 32 Hearings Allegations: Rape, Aggravated Sexual Assault, Adultery, Fraternization, Violation of an Order Max
Army Officer Beats Aggravated Assault & Conduct Unbecoming Charges
U.S. v. Army O-1 – Fort Bragg, NC / Tried at Fort McNair, Washington D.C. – General Court-Martial Allegations: Aggravated Assault with Means Likely to
Navy Sailor’s Sex Assault Case Tossed After UCI Bombshell
U.S. v. Navy E-6 – Norfolk Naval Base, Virginia – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault Max Punishment: 40+ years confinement, Dishonorable Discharge, Sex
Cleared of Rape Charges in Wild Multi-Victim Court-Martial Drama
U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Polk, LA – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Rape, Sexual Assault x4, Article 128 Assault, Total of 14 allegations
Army E-6 Beats False Sex Assault Charges at Fort Bragg
U.S. v. Army E-6 – Fort Bragg, North Carolina – General Court-Martial Allegations: Article 120 Sexual Assault, Article 128 Assault Consummated by Battery, Conduct Unbecoming
Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year
U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA
Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2
Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape
U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration
Take Command of Your Defense
Why Service Members Trust UCMJ Defense Lawyers
Call Us Today
Check Out Our Newest Book
UCMJ Survival Guide
UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers
Worldwide Military Defense Experience
Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation
Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses
War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense
Media and High-Profile Case Experience
Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets
Playlist
3:34
7:32
6:57
7:58
21:35
7:24
4:24
Frequently Asked Questions About Article 90 Defense
What is Article 90 under the UCMJ?
Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice refers to the offense of assaulting or willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer. It is one of the most serious charges involving respect for military authority and discipline. The article covers actions from physical assault to intentional refusal to obey lawful orders. Because of its gravity, accusations under Article 90 are handled with significant attention by military authorities. Understanding the exact nature of the charge is critical for mounting a defense. It involves examining the circumstances of the alleged conduct, the status of the officer involved, and the intent behind the actions. Legal counsel can help clarify these elements and develop a strategy tailored to each case.
What penalties can result from an Article 90 conviction?
Penalties for an Article 90 conviction can be severe and vary depending on the specifics of the offense and rank of the officers involved. Punishments may include confinement, reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay, and even a dishonorable discharge from the military. These consequences not only impact the individual’s military career but can have lasting effects on civilian life. Because of these potential outcomes, it is essential to address the charges promptly and with effective legal assistance. Early intervention can sometimes lead to charge reductions or alternative resolutions that minimize the impact on the service member’s future.
How does the military court process work for these charges?
Military court proceedings for Article 90 charges typically begin with an investigation, followed by preferral and referral of charges to a court-martial. The accused will have the opportunity to consult with defense counsel, participate in pretrial motions, and eventually face trial before a military judge or panel. The process is governed by strict procedural rules, and understanding these is essential for mounting a defense. Legal counsel plays a critical role in ensuring rights are protected and that the accused receives a fair trial within the military justice system.
Can I negotiate a lesser charge in an Article 90 case?
It is sometimes possible to negotiate lesser charges or alternative resolutions in an Article 90 case, depending on the strength of the evidence and circumstances. Plea negotiations can lead to reduced penalties or non-judicial punishment, which may be more favorable for the service member. However, such negotiations require careful consideration and skilled representation to avoid unintended consequences. Understanding the options and potential outcomes with legal assistance is crucial before agreeing to any plea arrangement.
What should I do if accused of assaulting a superior officer?
If you are accused of assaulting or disobeying a superior officer, it is important to seek legal representation immediately. Do not discuss the case with others or make statements without counsel present. Early legal advice can help protect your rights and guide you through the complex military justice process. Documenting your version of events and cooperating with your defense attorney are key steps. Avoid actions that could be perceived as hostile or non-compliant, as these may worsen your situation.
How important is legal representation in military cases?
Legal representation is highly important in military cases involving Article 90 charges. Military law has unique procedures and standards that differ significantly from civilian courts. Experienced defense lawyers understand these nuances and can navigate the system effectively. Proper representation ensures that the accused’s rights are upheld, evidence is properly examined, and defense strategies are well-developed. This can greatly influence case outcomes and protect the service member’s future.
Are Article 90 charges common at Bremerton Navy Base?
Article 90 charges can occur at any military installation, including Bremerton Navy Base in Washington. While not everyday occurrences, these charges arise from situations where military discipline and authority are challenged. The base’s proximity to Bremerton city and its strategic importance make maintaining order essential. Service members stationed at or near Bremerton should be aware of the serious nature of such charges and the importance of immediate legal support if accused.
What defenses are available against Article 90 accusations?
Defenses against Article 90 accusations often include challenging the intent to disobey or assault, questioning the legality of the orders given, or providing context that mitigates the severity of the alleged conduct. Sometimes, misunderstandings or lack of proper communication contribute to the charges. A defense lawyer will investigate all facts, interview witnesses, and review military regulations to construct a defense strategy tailored to the specifics of the case. This comprehensive approach can result in reduced charges or dismissal.
How long does an Article 90 case typically take?
The duration of an Article 90 case can vary widely depending on the complexity and whether the case is resolved through negotiation or proceeds to trial. Some cases may conclude within a few months, while others require extensive investigation and court-martial preparation that can extend the timeline. Timely response and active participation with your defense team can help manage the process efficiently. Understanding the stages of the military justice system helps set realistic expectations for case resolution.
Can an Article 90 charge affect my military benefits?
An Article 90 conviction can affect military benefits, including retirement eligibility and access to certain programs. A dishonorable or bad conduct discharge resulting from such charges may lead to loss of benefits and difficulties transitioning to civilian life. This underscores the importance of a strong defense aimed at minimizing or avoiding punitive outcomes. Protecting your military record is crucial for preserving benefits and future opportunities.