UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers

Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Military Article 131 – Perjury Defense Lawyer

Military Criminal Defense Lawyers

Understanding Military Article 131 Perjury Defense at Camp Pendleton

Located in Southern California near Oceanside, Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton is a critical installation for the U.S. Marine Corps. Facing a charge under Article 131 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which addresses perjury, can have severe consequences for service members stationed here. Handling such a charge requires careful legal navigation to protect your rights and military career.

At UCMJ Defense, based in Florida, our military defense lawyers are committed to assisting service members at Camp Pendleton and throughout the region. We understand the unique challenges posed by military legal proceedings and provide dedicated representation to help you respond effectively to perjury allegations under Article 131.

The Significance of Skilled Defense in Article 131 Perjury Cases

Defending against a perjury charge under Article 131 is vital because such allegations can undermine a service member’s integrity and career. Effective legal support ensures that your case is thoroughly examined, and all defenses are considered, potentially reducing or dismissing the charges. This protective approach helps maintain your standing within the military justice system and safeguards your future opportunities.

About UCMJ Defense and Our Commitment to Camp Pendleton Service Members

UCMJ Defense, led by attorneys Waddington and Gonzalez, offers dedicated legal defense for military personnel facing criminal charges. Serving clients across the United States, including those at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton in California, our team understands the complexities of military law and the importance of tailored defense strategies that respect the military environment and regulations.

Guide to Military Article 131: Perjury Defense at Camp Pendleton

Article 131 of the UCMJ addresses perjury, which involves knowingly making false statements under oath. For Marines stationed at Camp Pendleton, understanding this article is essential to recognize the severity of such charges and the potential repercussions, including court-martial and disciplinary actions.

Our guide provides a clear overview of the definitions, legal standards, and typical processes involved in Article 131 cases. This knowledge empowers service members to make informed decisions about their defense and to seek appropriate legal assistance promptly.

Defining Perjury Under Military Law

Perjury in the military context refers to making a false statement knowingly and willfully while under oath during official proceedings. This offense is taken seriously because it threatens the integrity of the military justice system. Understanding the legal criteria for perjury helps service members recognize the elements the prosecution must prove to secure a conviction under Article 131.

Key Elements and Legal Procedures in Article 131 Cases

To prove perjury under Article 131, the government must show that the statement was false, material to the proceeding, and made knowingly and willfully. Legal proceedings typically involve investigations, pretrial hearings, and possibly a court-martial. Navigating these steps requires careful preparation and knowledgeable legal counsel to ensure your rights are protected throughout the process.

Glossary of Important Terms Related to Article 131 Defense

Understanding specialized terms related to Article 131 perjury charges can help service members better grasp the legal process. Below are explanations of common terms used in military justice proceedings concerning perjury allegations.

Materiality

Materiality refers to the importance of a false statement in influencing the outcome of a military proceeding. For a perjury charge to hold, the false statement must be significant enough to affect the decision-making process.

Knowingly and Willfully

This term means that the individual intentionally made a false statement with awareness of its untruthfulness, rather than by accident or mistake.

Court-Martial

A court-martial is a military court that tries service members accused of violating the UCMJ, including perjury under Article 131. It functions similarly to civilian criminal courts but follows military legal procedures.

Article 131

Article 131 is the section of the Uniform Code of Military Justice that defines and penalizes perjury committed by service members during official military proceedings.

Comparing Legal Defense Options for Article 131 Charges

Service members facing Article 131 charges at Camp Pendleton have several options for legal defense, including military defense counsel and civilian military defense attorneys. Understanding the differences in experience, approach, and resources can help you choose the most effective representation tailored to your case circumstances.

When Limited Legal Intervention May Be Appropriate:

Minor or Technical Violations

In cases where the alleged perjury involves minor inaccuracies or misunderstandings without intent to deceive, a limited legal approach focusing on clarification and negotiation might be sufficient to resolve the matter without extensive litigation.

Strong Evidence Against the Prosecution

If preliminary investigations reveal weak or insufficient evidence to support the charge, limited intervention can focus on motions to dismiss or reduce charges, avoiding prolonged court proceedings.

The Need for Comprehensive Defense in Complex Article 131 Cases:

Serious Allegations with Career Impact

When perjury allegations threaten a service member’s career and reputation, comprehensive legal representation is essential to develop a robust defense strategy, including evidence gathering, witness interviews, and court-martial preparation.

Complicated Legal and Factual Issues

Complexities in the case such as conflicting testimony, procedural errors, or overlapping charges require thorough legal analysis and advocacy to protect your rights and ensure a fair process.

Advantages of Choosing a Full-Service Defense Approach

A comprehensive defense approach provides a detailed examination of all aspects of the case, improving the chances of a favorable outcome. It ensures that no detail is overlooked and that all potential defenses are explored.

This approach also offers peace of mind to the accused by providing consistent communication, strategic planning, and dedicated support throughout the legal process at Camp Pendleton.

Thorough Case Investigation

Comprehensive defense includes in-depth investigation to uncover all relevant facts, identify inconsistencies, and collect evidence that may support your innocence or mitigate the charges.

Strategic Legal Advocacy

Careful legal planning and advocacy tailored to your specific case circumstances can influence the outcome positively, whether through negotiation or trial, ensuring your defense is as strong as possible.

As Featured On:

logos

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

justice
Gonzalez & Waddington Law Firm

Top Searched Keywords

Tips for Service Members Facing Article 131 Perjury Charges

Understand the Charge Thoroughly

Before responding to any allegations, make sure you fully understand the nature of the perjury charge under Article 131. Knowing what the government must prove can help you work effectively with your defense team.

Maintain Professionalism in All Proceedings

Conduct yourself with respect and professionalism throughout military legal processes. This behavior can positively influence how your case is perceived by military officials and judges.

Seek Legal Assistance Promptly

Engage with qualified military defense lawyers early to ensure your rights are protected from the outset and to build a strong defense strategy tailored to your circumstances at Camp Pendleton.

Why You Should Consider Defense Services for Article 131 Charges

Facing perjury charges at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton can have serious personal and professional consequences. Having dedicated legal representation helps you understand your options, navigate the military justice system, and work toward the best possible outcome in your case.

A knowledgeable defense team can also provide guidance on military procedures and help mitigate the stress involved in criminal military proceedings, allowing you to focus on your duties and personal well-being.

Common Situations That Lead to Article 131 Perjury Defense Needs

Perjury charges may arise from false statements made during investigations, trials, or official reports. Situations include disciplinary hearings, administrative inquiries, or court-martial proceedings where testimony or statements are under oath.

False Testimony During Court-Martial

A service member may be accused of lying under oath during their own trial or while testifying in the trial of others, prompting Article 131 charges.

Inaccurate Statements in Official Reports

Submitting deliberately false information in official military reports or documents can lead to perjury allegations if those statements are made under oath.

Misleading Answers During Investigations

Providing knowingly false answers during military investigations or sworn questioning can result in perjury charges under Article 131.

Meet Your Defense Team

11 Michael Waddington HeadshotPro
Alexandra Gonzalez - Top Military Defense Lawyer

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

five golden stars product rating review for apps and websites vector 1

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.
Alexandra Gonzalez - Top Military Defense Lawyer

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

five golden stars product rating review for apps and websites vector 1

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

ucmj2

Take Command of Your Defense

At UCMJ Defense, we are committed to supporting service members facing complex military legal challenges at Camp Pendleton and beyond. Our team is here to provide attentive and strategic defense to protect your rights and your future.

Why Service Members at Camp Pendleton Trust UCMJ Defense Lawyers

Service members select UCMJ Defense because of our proven ability to navigate military justice cases sensitively and effectively. We understand the stakes involved with Article 131 charges and strive to secure the best results for our clients.
Our lawyers, including Waddington and Gonzalez, bring dedication and a thorough approach to every case, ensuring that clients receive personalized attention and informed legal guidance throughout their defense.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.
amazonbuy
ucmjbook

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

ucmjglobe

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.
ucmjsoldier 1

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.
ucmjmedia

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.
gwyoutube scaled

Playlist

7 Videos

Frequently Asked Questions About Article 131 Perjury Defense

What constitutes perjury under Article 131?

Perjury under Article 131 involves knowingly making false statements under oath during official military proceedings. To be charged, the false statement must be material, meaning it has the potential to influence the outcome of the proceeding. Understanding this helps service members recognize the seriousness of the charge. If you face such allegations, it is important to seek legal guidance to ensure your rights are protected throughout the process.

Penalties for perjury under Article 131 can be severe, including confinement, reduction in rank, forfeiture of pay, and a punitive discharge. The exact consequences depend on the circumstances of the case and the severity of the offense. Military courts take perjury seriously because it compromises the integrity of legal proceedings within the armed forces.

Defending against a perjury charge requires a detailed review of the evidence, including the context of the statements and any supporting documentation. A strong defense may involve demonstrating a lack of intent to deceive or challenging the materiality of the alleged false statement. Legal representation experienced in military law can help develop an effective strategy tailored to your specific case.

Civilian lawyers with experience in military justice can assist with Article 131 perjury cases, especially those familiar with the UCMJ. Their outside perspective and knowledge of both civilian and military legal principles can provide valuable defense. However, it is essential to choose attorneys who understand the unique aspects of military law and procedures.

If accused of making false statements under oath, it is critical to remain calm and avoid making additional statements without legal counsel present. Early consultation with a qualified military defense attorney can help you understand your rights and options. Prompt action enhances the ability to mount an effective defense and navigate the military justice system.

The court-martial process for perjury charges typically begins with an investigation, followed by pretrial hearings and possibly a trial. It operates similarly to civilian criminal trials but follows military-specific procedures and rules of evidence. Understanding this process is important for preparing your defense and knowing what to expect at each stage.

It is sometimes possible to have perjury charges reduced or dismissed, depending on the evidence and circumstances of the case. Motions to dismiss can be filed if procedural errors or insufficient evidence are present. Skilled legal advocacy is essential to explore these options effectively and pursue the best possible outcome.

The duration of an Article 131 case varies depending on the complexity of the allegations, the gathering of evidence, and the military justice system’s schedule. Cases can take weeks to several months from the initial charge to resolution. Staying informed and working closely with your legal team helps manage this process efficiently.

A conviction for perjury can significantly impact your military career, leading to disciplinary actions, loss of rank, or discharge. It may also affect future employment opportunities within and outside the military. Therefore, defending against such charges vigorously is essential to protect your professional and personal future.

Appealing a conviction under Article 131 is possible through the military appellate courts. The appeals process reviews the trial’s legal and procedural aspects to ensure fairness. Having knowledgeable legal representation throughout the appeal can improve the chances of a successful outcome or sentence reduction.

LEGAL SERVICES

MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS
LEGAL DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES
MILITARY DEFENSE
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE & DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
ARMY
AIR FORCE
SPACE FORCE
MARINE CORPS
COAST GUARD
UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
SEX CRIMES
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
VIOLENT CRIMES
PROPERTY & FINANCIAL
INTEGRITY & TRUTH
MILITARY CONDUCT
CYBER & MISCONDUCT