Hagel aims to curb unlawful influence UCI arguments in trials

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel speaks to members of the U.S. Army 101st Airborne Division at Jalalabad Airfield in eastern Afghanistan, in March 2013. Legal experts say Hagel and other senior officials can talk about sexual assault, but they should avoid references to specific punishments and outcomes.
Secretary of Defense memo on military justice system

Military defense attorneys

Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is pressing military juries and others involved in military criminal proceedings to exercise their own judgment based on facts, a message that comes as claims of unlawful command influence by senior officials are being made in some sexual assault trials.

Comments by President Barack Obama, Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, Marine Commandant Gen. James Amos and others have been cited for the appearance of improperly influencing military jurors and command authorities, who some argue may interpret “get-tough” comments on sexual assault as directives.

Military Sexual Assault Defenses : Mistake of Fact Explained by a Military Defense Lawyer

YouTube video

“Central to military justice is the trust that those involved in the process base their decisions on their independent judgment,” Hagel wrote in an Aug. 6 memo slated for wide distribution. That judgment “must be based purely on the facts of each individual case, not … an effort to produce what is thought to be the outcome desired by senior officials, military or civilian.”

“There are no expected or required dispositions, outcomes, or sentences in any military justice case,” Hagel wrote.

In at least two recent cases, Obama’s comments to reporters in May could possibly affect the type of punishment that servicemembers, if found guilty, may receive.

Obama said servicemembers engaging in wrongful sexual activities must be “prosecuted, stripped of their positions, court-martialed, fired, dishonorably discharged. Period.”

Obama’s call for dishonorable discharges — one of multiple options a jury considers during sentencing — triggered a Navy military judge, Cmdr. Marcus Fulton, to rule in June that two defendants facing sexual assault charges could not receive punitive discharges, if convicted.

Fulton reasoned that Obama’s comments tainted the public’s belief that military jurors could independently sentence the defendants. Fulton’s ruling has been appealed.

In another case, military judge Cmdr. John Maksym found that comments by Obama and Dempsey constituted apparent unlawful influence, but he instead gave the defense extra juror challenges.


Scroll to Top