UCMJ Military Defense Lawyers

Article 134 Defense for Obscene Materials on Government Systems

Military Criminal Defense Lawyers

Understanding Article 134 and Its Impact on Military Personnel

Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice addresses offenses involving obscene materials on government systems. Service members charged under this article face serious consequences that can affect their military career and future opportunities. It is important to understand how this article applies and the protections available to those accused.

Navigating charges related to obscene materials on military or government devices requires a clear grasp of military regulations and the legal process. A thorough defense ensures that all facts are considered and that the rights of the accused are safeguarded throughout the proceedings.

Why a Strong Defense Against Article 134 Charges Matters

Facing allegations under Article 134 can lead to harsh penalties including loss of rank, confinement, or discharge. A strong defense helps ensure a fair evaluation of the case and protects a service member’s military standing. Effective legal representation can make a significant difference in the outcome by addressing all relevant aspects of the charges.

About Our Ft. Lauderdale Military Defense Team

Based in Ft. Lauderdale, our team is dedicated to assisting military personnel charged with offenses under the UCMJ, including Article 134. We focus on comprehensive case review and personalized support to help clients understand the complexities of military justice and achieve the best possible results.

Comprehensive Guide to Article 134 Charges for Obscene Materials

Article 134 covers offenses related to obscene materials on government systems, including content depicting sexual acts or nudity deemed inappropriate by military standards. This provision aims to maintain discipline and order by prohibiting the use of official systems for such materials.

To prove a violation of Article 134, it must be shown that the accused knowingly used government property to access or distribute prohibited content. Investigations often involve digital evidence and require careful legal analysis to build a solid defense.

What Are Obscene Materials Under Article 134?

Obscene materials include images, videos, or writings that depict sexual acts or nudity in a way considered offensive by military regulations. The military enforces a strict interpretation of obscenity aligned with federal laws to protect morale and discipline within the ranks.

Key Elements to Establish an Article 134 Violation

Prosecutors must demonstrate that the accused intentionally used government systems to view, share, or store obscene content. This often involves collecting digital evidence and ensuring all investigative procedures comply with military law to uphold the integrity of the case.

Glossary of Important Terms Related to Article 134

Familiarity with specific terms related to Article 134 offenses helps in understanding legal discussions and case documentation. Below are definitions of key concepts often encountered in these cases.

Article 134

A provision within the Uniform Code of Military Justice that covers offenses not specifically addressed by other articles, including conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline or service-discrediting behavior.

Government Systems

Computers, networks, and communication devices owned or operated by the military or government for official use, which are subject to regulations regarding appropriate content and usage.

Obscene Materials

Content that depicts sexual acts or nudity in a manner considered offensive or inappropriate under military regulations and federal statutes.

UCMJ

Uniform Code of Military Justice, the legal framework governing the conduct of members of the United States military.

Legal Strategies for Handling Article 134 Charges

Those facing Article 134 charges may choose between limited legal assistance or a comprehensive defense. The choice depends on factors such as the complexity of the case, evidence available, and desired outcomes. Each approach has distinct advantages and considerations.

When Limited Legal Assistance May Be Appropriate:

Minor or First-Time Offenses

For minor infractions or first-time charges where evidence is minimal, limited legal representation can be sufficient to negotiate or reduce penalties while resolving the matter efficiently.

Clear Evidence and Admission

If the facts are straightforward and the accused admits to the offense, a focused legal strategy can help minimize consequences and facilitate a resolution without extensive proceedings.

Benefits of a Comprehensive Defense Approach:

Complex Cases with Significant Evidence

Complex cases involving multiple charges or substantial evidence require a thorough defense to protect the accused’s rights and ensure all aspects are carefully addressed.

Potential for Severe Penalties

When facing serious penalties such as confinement or discharge, detailed preparation and full legal representation are important to influence outcomes favorably.

Advantages of Engaging Full Legal Representation

A comprehensive defense includes detailed case investigation, evidence gathering, witness interviews, and procedural challenges to build a strong case tailored to the individual circumstances.

This approach offers continuous support throughout the legal process, ensuring clients receive clear guidance and that their rights are upheld at every stage.

Enhanced Case Analysis

Thorough examination of digital and testimonial evidence helps identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and develop effective counterarguments to improve defense outcomes.

Strategic Negotiation

A full defense team can negotiate with military prosecutors for reduced charges or alternative resolutions that lessen the impact on the accused’s military career.

As Featured On:

logos

NEED MILITARY LAW HELP?

Fill out this form or call 1-800-921-8607 to request a consultation.

justice
Gonzalez & Waddington Law Firm

Practice Areas

Top Searched Keywords

Tips for Navigating Article 134 Charges

Understand Military Regulations

Familiarize yourself with the military’s policies regarding the use of government systems and what content is prohibited to reduce the risk of unintentional violations.

Preserve Digital Evidence

Keep all relevant digital files and communications intact without deleting or altering them, as they may be essential to your defense.

Seek Timely Legal Guidance

Engage with a legal professional early to understand your rights and develop a defense strategy before the legal process advances.

Why Military Personnel Should Consider Defense for Article 134 Charges

Charges under Article 134 for obscene materials can have lasting consequences on military careers, including disciplinary actions and loss of benefits. Defense services help ensure a fair legal process and protect future opportunities within and beyond the military.

Legal representation clarifies complex military laws and procedures, reduces stress, and improves the chances of obtaining a favorable outcome during investigations and hearings.

Typical Situations Leading to Article 134 Charges

Charges often arise from unauthorized use of government computers to access or distribute inappropriate content. Investigations may follow reports from supervisors or routine audits of military digital systems.

Accessing Obscene Websites

Using military internet access to visit websites containing sexually explicit or offensive material can result in charges if such activity is detected during monitoring.

Sharing Inappropriate Content

Distributing obscene images or messages via government email or communication platforms is prohibited and may lead to disciplinary action.

Possession of Obscene Files on Military Devices

Storing forbidden content on government-issued computers or storage devices violates military policy and can result in formal charges under Article 134.

Meet Your Defense Team

11 Michael Waddington HeadshotPro
Alexandra Gonzalez - Top Military Defense Lawyer

Michael S. Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

five golden stars product rating review for apps and websites vector 1

PARTNER

Michael Waddington is a best‐selling author and criminal defense attorney who represents military personnel in courts worldwide—both after charges are filed and during pre‐charge investigations—specializing in serious offenses such as war crimes, sex crimes, violent crimes, and white‐collar cases. Drawing on his rigorous discipline from Brazilian Jiu‐Jitsu, he trains both civilian and military defense lawyers in advanced cross‐examination techniques, a skillset detailed in his three popular books on the subject. His expertise is regularly sought by major media outlets—ranging from CNN and 60 Minutes to the BBC and ABC’s “Nightline”—and he has even contributed to episodes of the Golden Globe–winning series “The Good Wife.” Michael instructs both civilian and military criminal defense attorneys on the art of effectively cross-examining and discrediting adversarial witnesses. Drawing from his three best-selling books on cross-examination and years of experience confronting numerous cunning and aggressive prosecution witnesses.
Alexandra Gonzalez - Top Military Defense Lawyer

Alexandra González-Waddington

Criminal Defense Lawyer

five golden stars product rating review for apps and websites vector 1

PARTNER

Alexandra González is a founding partner of González & Waddington Law Firm, practicing in Florida, Georgia, and military courts worldwide, where she has defended hundreds of clients charged with violent crimes, sexual assault, and white-collar offenses since 2003. She has led high-profile military sexual assault and war-crimes cases stemming from the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts and is regularly featured by major outlets such as 60 Minutes, ABC’s Nightline, Rolling Stone, the BBC, Fox News, and CNN. As one of the first Public Defenders for Georgia’s Augusta Judicial Circuit, she handled a broad spectrum of cases—including rape, larceny, violent crimes, and domestic violence—and she holds a J.D. from Temple University’s Beasley School of Law, where she completed the nationally ranked Integrated Trial Advocacy Program. A Georgia-registered mediator, she continues to shape the practice of military and civilian defense through her courtroom work and advocacy.

Battle-Tested Results

Recent Case Results

Make a False Rape Allegation & Win Soldier of the Year

U.S. v. Army CW2 – Fort Gordon, GA

Allegations: RAPE, Fraternization, Adultery
Max Punishment: LIFE, Dismissal, Sex Offender Registration
Result: ALL CHARGES DISMISSED
Discharge: RETIRED WITH AN HONORABLE
Location/Branch/Rank: Fort Gordon – Augusta, GA/Army/CW2

Cheating Marine Officer Calls Rape

U.S. v. Marine O-3 – Marine Forces Reserve, Naval Support Activity, New Orleans, LA Allegations: Article 120 Rape/Sexual Assault Max Punishment: Life in prison, Dismissal, Sex offender registration

ucmj2

Take Command of Your Defense

Our team is committed to supporting military members facing Article 134 charges. We provide comprehensive legal assistance tailored to each client’s unique situation to protect their rights and future.

Why Service Members Trust Our UCMJ Defense Team

Military personnel choose our legal team for our in-depth knowledge of the UCMJ and dedication to protecting the rights of those in uniform. We emphasize thorough case preparation and clear communication throughout the process.
Our approach combines assertive defense with practical advice, ensuring clients are well-informed and empowered to make decisions during their legal proceedings.

Call Us Today

Check Out Our Newest Book

UCMJ Survival Guide

UCMJ Survival Guide: The Complete Military Justice Manual for Service Members & Families: Whether you’re facing an investigation, court-martial, Article 15 (NJP), or administrative separation, UCMJ Survival Guide is your essential resource for navigating the military justice system. Written by two of the most experienced and respected military defense lawyers in the field—Michael and Alexandra Waddington—this comprehensive guide delivers clear, actionable strategies to protect your career, reputation, and future. Michael and Alexandra are among the top military defense lawyers and recognized as some of the most experienced sexual assault defense attorneys in the country. They have successfully defended service members in high-profile Article 120 UCMJ sexual assault cases, complex court-martials, and administrative separation proceedings across all branches of the U.S. military.
amazonbuy
ucmjbook

UCMJ Criminal Defense Lawyers

ucmjglobe

Worldwide Military Defense Experience

Defending Service Members Across Every Theater and Installation

The González & Waddington Law Firm’s global reach sets them apart from regional military defense attorneys. With active cases spanning from Fort Bragg to forward operating bases in combat zones, from Norfolk Naval Station to remote Air Force installations, their practice truly encompasses the worldwide nature of modern military service.
ucmjsoldier 1

Specialized Expertise in Serious Military Offenses

War Crimes, Sexual Assault, Violent Crimes, and White-Collar Defense

The most serious charges under the UCMJ require the most experienced defense attorneys. The González & Waddington Law Firm has built its reputation by successfully defending service members against the gravest allegations—cases where the stakes couldn’t be higher and the margin for error is virtually nonexistent.
ucmjmedia

Media and High-Profile Case Experience

Featured on CNN, 60 Minutes, BBC, and Major News Outlets

The legal expertise of Michael Waddington and Alexandra González-Waddington has garnered attention from the world’s most prestigious media outlets, a testament to their standing as leading authorities in military criminal defense. This media recognition reflects not only their legal acumen but also their ability to handle high-stakes cases under intense public scrutiny.
gwyoutube scaled

Playlist

7 Videos

Frequently Asked Questions About Article 134 Obscene Materials Charges

What is Article 134 of the UCMJ?

Article 134 is a provision within the Uniform Code of Military Justice that addresses offenses not specifically covered by other articles. Often called the ‘general article,’ it includes conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline or service-discrediting behavior. This article is broad and can encompass numerous offenses, including those involving obscene materials on government property. It provides the military with a mechanism to address misconduct that might otherwise go unpunished. Maintaining discipline and order within the armed forces is essential, and Article 134 ensures service members adhere to expected standards of conduct, especially regarding government resources and systems.

Obscene materials under Article 134 typically include images, videos, or written content depicting sexual acts, nudity, or other explicit content deemed offensive by military standards. The military applies a strict interpretation of obscenity, often aligning with federal statutes and military regulations. This includes any material that could undermine morale or discipline within the ranks. The definition can vary depending on context and intent, but generally, unauthorized possession, distribution, or viewing of such materials on government computers or networks is prohibited. Understanding these definitions is essential for service members to avoid unintentional violations.

Accidental access to obscene content may still lead to an investigation under Article 134, as the military holds service members responsible for their use of government systems. However, the circumstances of access, including intent and knowledge, are critical factors in determining whether charges are appropriate. If the access was truly inadvertent and there was no intent to view or distribute prohibited material, this can serve as a strong defense. It is important to provide a clear explanation and cooperate during the investigation to clarify the situation.

Penalties for violations of Article 134 related to obscene materials vary based on the severity of the offense and the individual’s military record. Possible consequences include non-judicial punishment, reduction in rank, confinement, forfeiture of pay, or even discharge from service. The military justice system considers the impact on order and discipline when determining punishment. Even minor infractions can have significant repercussions. Early legal intervention can help mitigate these penalties and protect the service member’s future.

Defending against Article 134 charges requires a detailed review of the evidence and circumstances surrounding the alleged offense. A strong defense may involve challenging the validity of the evidence, demonstrating lack of intent, or identifying procedural errors during the investigation. Presenting mitigating factors such as character references or evidence of good conduct can also influence outcomes. Engaging with legal counsel knowledgeable in military law is essential to navigate these defenses effectively and protect your rights throughout the process.

In some cases, charges under Article 134 can be reduced or dismissed depending on the strength of the evidence, the circumstances of the offense, and the service member’s record. Negotiations with the prosecution may result in plea agreements or alternative resolutions. Effective legal representation plays a key role in exploring these options and advocating for the best possible outcome. Early involvement in the legal process significantly increases the chances of a favorable resolution.

An Article 134 conviction can have serious consequences on a military career, including loss of rank, disciplinary records, and potential discharge. Such outcomes may affect future promotions and benefits. The military takes these offenses seriously due to their impact on morale and discipline. However, with appropriate legal defense and guidance, it is possible to minimize these effects and preserve military standing as much as possible during proceedings.

The length of the legal process for Article 134 charges varies depending on case complexity, investigation timelines, and military court schedules. Some cases resolve quickly through negotiation, while others may require extended hearings or trials. Service members should be prepared for a process that could last several months and maintain communication with their legal representatives to stay informed and ready throughout.

While it is possible to represent yourself in military legal matters, it is generally not advisable, especially for complex charges like those under Article 134. Military law is specialized, and navigating the procedures without legal training can be challenging. Having legal representation ensures that your rights are protected, evidence is properly reviewed, and you receive guidance tailored to your case. This support is critical to achieving the best possible outcome.

If you are under investigation for obscene materials on a government system, it is important to remain calm and avoid making statements without legal advice. Cooperate with investigators but understand your rights, including the right to counsel. Seek legal guidance promptly to understand the charges, gather evidence, and develop a defense. Early action can significantly affect the direction and outcome of your case.

LEGAL SERVICES

MILITARY DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIONS
LEGAL DEFENSE & INVESTIGATIVE SERVICES
MILITARY DEFENSE
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS
INVESTIGATIONS
ADMINISTRATIVE & DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
ARMY
AIR FORCE
SPACE FORCE
MARINE CORPS
COAST GUARD
UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE
SEX CRIMES
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
VIOLENT CRIMES
PROPERTY & FINANCIAL
INTEGRITY & TRUTH
MILITARY CONDUCT
CYBER & MISCONDUCT